U.S. Exit from the WHO: What It Means for Public Health
The U.S. has officially left the World Health Organization (WHO), a significant decision that stems from President Trump’s concerns about the agency’s handling of global health crises like COVID-19. However, this move leaves the U.S. with over $130 million in unpaid dues to the WHO, raising questions about the future of its collaboration in global health initiatives.
Experts warn that this exit may hinder efforts to tackle future health emergencies. Lawrence Gostin, a public health law expert at Georgetown University, called it “the most ruinous presidential decision in my lifetime.” He emphasized that this split could weaken the ability of U.S. scientists to react to outbreaks and develop vaccines.
The WHO plays a crucial role in coordinating responses to global health threats, managing programs for diseases like polio and tracking new viral outbreaks. It also supports low-income countries with resources and expertise. Dr. Ronald Nahass, president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, criticized the withdrawal as “shortsighted” and “scientifically reckless.”
While the Trump administration argued that the U.S. could establish direct health partnerships without the WHO, experts doubt the effectiveness of this approach. Many emerging viruses are first detected in places like China, and experts like Gostin question whether countries will be willing to share vital data. He pointed out that it seems unlikely many countries would collaborate with the U.S. given past tensions.
Historically, the U.S. has been a founding member and major donor to the WHO. On average, it contributes about $681 million annually in dues and voluntary funds. However, dissatisfaction with the WHO’s decisions during the pandemic led to this drastic step. Critics underline that organizations often make missteps, but collaboration is essential to overcoming global health threats.
The U.S. also has a legal obligation to fulfill financial commitments before ceasing membership, adding complexity to its exit. As of now, it has not settled dues for 2024 and 2025, which could affect future global health funding.
In summary, the U.S.’s withdrawal from the WHO raises concerns not just about financial obligations but more critically, about how it will address future health threats domestically and globally. Public health experts fear this decision may create gaps in disease monitoring and response capabilities, ultimately impacting health outcomes worldwide.
Source link
Donald Trump, World Health Organization, Medication, United States government, General news, Send to Apple News, United States, Government surveillance, Washington news, Coronavirus, Politics, Immunizations, Pandemics, Ronald Nahass, Health, Public health, China, World news, Flu, World News
