State Senator Creigh Deeds from Charlottesville recently sent a detailed letter to University Rector Rachel Sheridan and Vice Rector Porter Wilkinson. This letter, dated August 1, addresses the circumstances surrounding former University President Jim Ryan’s resignation. It includes 46 specific questions focused on the actions of the University’s governing board amid a Justice Department investigation.
The Justice Department is looking into allegations that the University has not adequately dismantled its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, potentially violating federal civil rights laws. Deeds expressed concerns about the transparency and governance of the University’s board, questioning if there were outside influences on their decisions.
In Deeds’ letter, he highlighted meetings that occurred between Sheridan and Wilkinson and Justice Department officials on June 3, June 24, and June 26, before they took up their roles officially on July 1. He pressed for clarity on what was discussed and whether Ryan’s resignation was suggested as a resolution to the investigation.
Deeds also referred to a New York Times article in which Harmeet Dhillon from the Justice Department denied that anyone from her office demanded Ryan’s resignation. The senator sought to understand how the board’s actions aligned with federal directives, specifically asking if they had consulted with Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin regarding the March 7 resolution on DEI.
Interestingly, public sentiment around this issue has been notable on social media, with many users expressing disbelief and anger at the lack of transparency. Discussions about the governance structure of public universities have gained traction, as people question how decisions are made behind closed doors and what role faculty, students, and the general public should have in these processes.
Deeds’ scrutiny didn’t stop there. He questioned the rationale behind the board’s failure to respond to urgent letters from the Justice Department and sought to understand their approach to governance, especially after a vote of no confidence from the Faculty Senate.
This situation highlights broader concerns about accountability in higher education. According to a 2022 study from the American Association of University Professors, 63% of faculty felt disconnected from decision-making processes at their institutions. This speaks volumes about the need for better communication and shared governance in universities.
In his conclusion, Deeds emphasized the importance of shared governance and questioned how far the University’s governing body is willing to go in negotiations with federal authorities. His inquiries pose vital questions for the future and the integrity of governance in public universities.
For more details, you can check the original documents on the University Board of Visitors.





















