About 170,000 people in Washington are at risk of losing their food stamp benefits due to a new bill passed by Congress. The changes primarily affect the most vulnerable residents.
Of those at risk, around 137,000 will struggle with stricter work requirements. The remaining 33,000 comprise refugees and asylees who would also become ineligible for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Additionally, Washington state could incur around $88 million in added administrative costs each year.
If the state doesn’t maintain its low payment error rate, it may face over $100 million in extra expenses that the federal government currently covers. This financial pressure could push some states to reconsider their participation in the SNAP program altogether. Claire Lane, director of the Seattle-based Anti-Hunger and Nutrition Coalition, warned that this scenario is possible.
Democrats criticized the bill for harming the social safety net while benefiting wealthy Americans through tax cuts. This legislation proposes the largest cuts to food stamps since the program began, aiming for a $186 billion reduction in federal nutrition spending over the next decade.
The White House has suggested that the mission of SNAP is failing and claimed the new changes would focus on those who truly need help. Currently, able-bodied adults aged 18 to 54 without dependents must work at least 20 hours a week to qualify for food stamps. The new bill raises this age limit to 64 and adds work requirements for parents whose children are 14 or older. This means formerly exempt groups, such as veterans and homeless individuals, must also meet these new requirements.
Recent statistics show that as of March, over 908,000 people in Washington were receiving SNAP benefits, accounting for more than 10% of the state’s population. Nationally, SNAP supports over 42 million individuals. The 137,000 people potentially losing benefits represent about 15% of Washington’s SNAP participants, with reductions expected to average $56 per month for others who remain on the program.
The financial impact of these changes could severely affect local businesses, costing grocery stores and markets an estimated $360 million annually due to lost economic activity stemming from reduced SNAP benefits.
Moreover, the bill alters how states fund SNAP. States now must bear more of the costs associated with payment errors. If too many errors occur, they will have to cover additional expenses. Washington’s error rate was slightly above the acceptable threshold, potentially resulting in financial strain down the road.
This legislation comes amid broader budgetary challenges in Washington state, which recently enacted tax hikes and budget cuts to address a significant shortfall. As Claire Lane pointed out, this shift in responsibilities to states occurs during a period of economic uncertainty, further complicating budgeting efforts.
In summary, the recent changes in food stamp policy may lead to significant hardship for many Washington residents. The focus on stricter work requirements and the potential loss of benefits could drastically reshape the landscape of food assistance in the state.
Source link