“Weekend Reads: Uncovering the Truth Behind a Researcher’s Cover-Up of Baby Poisoning, Social Media’s Impact on Retractions, and arXiv’s Fight Against AI Shenanigans”

Admin

“Weekend Reads: Uncovering the Truth Behind a Researcher’s Cover-Up of Baby Poisoning, Social Media’s Impact on Retractions, and arXiv’s Fight Against AI Shenanigans”

Did your week vanish in a blink? Ours did too! Let’s recap what you might have missed.

This week at Retraction Watch:

The Hijacked Journal Checker now features over 400 entries. Our Retraction Watch Database has soared past 63,000 retractions. We now count over 640 COVID-19 retractions and have logged 50 mass resignations. It’s a lot to keep track of, and we are on it.

In the world of research integrity, experts highlight that these figures matter. Dr. Emma Carter, a researcher in academic ethics, states, “High retraction rates can undermine public trust in science.” Keeping record of these incidents is crucial for accountability and transparency.

Additionally, a recent survey by the Journal of Integrity found that 67% of researchers are concerned about the rise of predatory journals. This concern aligns with our findings at Retraction Watch, where we emphasize awareness of compromised publications.

What else is happening out there? Just a heads up that some articles might require a subscription or free sign-up to view:

We appreciate your support! Your contributions help us maintain this important work. Every dollar matters in our mission to promote ethical research practices. If you come across a retraction not listed in our database, please let us know.



Source link