Mahuna Moitra News: During the dialogue on the Constitution in the Lok Sabha on Friday (December 13, 2024), there have been a number of heated exchanges. In this context, when Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra raised questions on the dying of Justice Loya, there was lots of uproar in the House. Regarding the Constitution, Mahua Moitra began her speech in the Parliament with Hilal Farid’s poem – ‘Mubarak Ghadi Hai..’
Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra additionally made a number of feedback on the function of the judiciary throughout the dialogue on the Constitution. Mahua Moitra additionally talked about the assertion of former CJI (DY Chandrachud) with out naming him, in which the former Chief Justice had mentioned concerning the Ram Mandir verdict that he had meditated on God earlier than giving the verdict. Mahua Moitra mentioned that we’d like judges who listen to the Constitution and never those that listen to God earlier than giving their verdict.
Justice DY Chandrachud was additionally talked about
During this dialogue, Mahua Moitra raised the subject of Justice Loya’s dying in the House. Mahua Moitra mentioned that there are some who don’t bow earlier than the authorities. Similarly, there was Justice Loya who died lengthy earlier than his dying. Mahua Moitra additionally talked about the Chief Justice (DY Chandrachud) with out naming him and mentioned that there are judges who’re glad to get videography achieved with the God who has come to their home.
‘This isn’t the first time’
There was lots of uproar in the House on Mahua Moitra’s assertion. While registering his objection, BJP MP Nishikant Dubey mentioned that the statements given by Mahua Moitra are objectionable. Nishikant Dubey mentioned that investigation has been achieved into the dying of Justice Loya and a senior decide of the Supreme Court himself has mentioned that his dying was not unnatural. On the incident of the Prime Minister visiting the home of former Chief Justice (Justice Chandrachud), Nishikant Dubey mentioned that this isn’t the first time. Even earlier than this, the Chief Justice and different judges had been visiting the Prime Minister’s residence additionally. In such a scenario, if the Prime Minister goes there then it’s not proper to make it an subject.
Kiren Rijiju additionally lodged objection
After Nishikant Dubey, Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju additionally lodged an objection on this and mentioned that no matter Mahua Moitra has mentioned, she ought to both confirm it in the House or strict motion will be taken towards her as per parliamentary custom.
Parliament adjourned once more
Due to this assertion of Mahua Moitra, the proceedings of the House have been disrupted for about 45-50 minutes. When the proceedings began after 45-50 minutes, Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla mentioned that he’ll look into the matter and no matter objectionable issues are there. He will be faraway from the proceedings of the House. Along with this, the opposition additionally lodged an objection to Rijiju’s assertion, on which the Speaker of the Lok Sabha mentioned that his assertion will even be examined and if there’s something objectionable in it, it should additionally not be allowed to be part of the proceedings of the House.
Also read- ‘Red Fort is ours, get it captured’, Mughal’s daughter-in-law appealed to the court docket, what was the reply?
