White House Budget Office Warns of Widespread Job Losses Amid Potential Government Shutdown | CNN Politics

The White House has advised federal agencies to prepare for the possibility of mass layoffs if the government shuts down. This unusual move comes from a recent memo by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which signals a shift in how shutdowns have been managed in the past.

The memo instructs agencies to pinpoint programs that lose funding when Congress misses the September 30 deadline. These programs could face significant cuts, potentially leading to job losses that align with President Trump’s priorities.

An OMB spokesperson has yet to comment on this directive. Meanwhile, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer described it as a tactic to intimidate lawmakers. He expressed concerns that Trump is wielding job cuts not to functionally govern but to instill fear.

This looming threat is escalating tensions as Democrats demand concessions, including an extension of subsidies for the Affordable Care Act. These subsidies are set to expire soon, and the push from Democrats is a bid to ensure more services continue without interruption during budget negotiations.

Interestingly, OMB has been vocally critical of Democratic demands, describing their position as “insane.” They assert that core priorities will still be funded in the event of a shutdown, emphasizing a hardline stance against negotiations.

Historically, government shutdowns have varied widely in impact. Key services like Social Security payments and law enforcement typically continue, but others such as national parks and food inspections may halt, affecting everyday life.

Data from past shutdowns reveals that in March 2023, over 1.4 million employees were ready to go to work, with about 750,000 receiving pay from other sources. A significant number would face furloughs without pay, demonstrating the wide-reaching effects of temporary government closures.

Critics, especially those on the left, argue that using a shutdown to reduce the federal workforce is detrimental. Bobby Kogan, a former OMB official, noted that such actions would harm the nation’s talent pool and threaten essential services.

The ongoing conversation around government funding is not just about numbers on a balance sheet; it impacts real lives and jobs. As the deadline approaches, the stakes are high. The next moves from both sides will be crucial in determining the future of federal employment and essential services. With public sentiment often swinging based on these events, it’s clear that the reactions and views from everyday citizens are just as important to watch. The outcome of these discussions will shape the landscape of federal employment in the years to come.

For further reading on this topic, you can refer to resources from Politico and the Bipartisan Policy Center.

Source link