Why 75% of Americans Reject US Ambitions to Control Greenland – Insights from a CNN Poll

Admin

Why 75% of Americans Reject US Ambitions to Control Greenland – Insights from a CNN Poll

Three-quarters of Americans oppose the idea of the U.S. trying to take control of Greenland, a recent CNN poll shows. This survey reveals that only 25% of people back the notion of claiming the Danish territory. Even among Republicans, opinion is split; 50% support it, while the other half stands against it. Democrats are largely opposed, with 94% saying no, and 80% strongly disagreeing. Independents also share this reluctance, with about 80% opposing the move.

In a recent post on his platform, Truth Social, former President Trump declared that anything less than U.S. control of Greenland is “unacceptable.” This statement came just before a meeting involving Danish officials, Vice President JD Vance, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, which didn’t seem to ease tensions.

The poll indicates a general disinterest in U.S. expansionism. For instance, many show concern over Trump’s military strategy regarding Venezuela. Almost 60% believe he has overstepped in trying to extend American power. Only a third feel his actions are proportionate, and 55% say he has misused military force to fulfill his ambitions. These figures reflect a growing skepticism about Trump’s foreign policies. In fact, 57% think these policies have damaged America’s reputation globally, up from 53% last summer.

When it comes to military action in Venezuela, opinions are divided. About 52% oppose U.S. intervention there, while 48% are in favor. Concerns about the government’s stability linger, with many fearing a prolonged U.S. military presence.

Public sentiment extends to recent developments, too. Ahead of a meeting with Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, many Americans (58%) oppose U.S. attempts to manage Venezuela’s government after the removal of Maduro. Strong opposition outweighs strong support—31% to 13%.

Most Americans lack confidence that U.S. actions will stabilize Venezuela in the future. Nearly two-thirds think these interventions could lead to long-term troop deployments. Partisan divides are strikingly clear: 80% of Democrats oppose military action, while the same percentage of Republicans supports it.

Moreover, many see U.S. access to Venezuelan oil as a key reason behind the intervention, rather than the stated motivations of trying Maduro or addressing drug trafficking. Only 26% believe the well-being of Venezuelan people was a significant factor in this decision.

These insights shed light on a nation that is wary of expansionist tactics and remains critical of how foreign policy is carried out. The attitudes captured in the poll suggest a cautious approach is favored by the public as they reflect on the implications of such interventions.



Source link