The Trump administration hasn’t exactly been a friend to higher education in America. Recently, Vice President JD Vance called universities “the enemy,” criticizing them for being elitist and out of touch with the real needs of the job market. This rhetoric seems to be part of a broader strategy from the current Republican Party to position itself as a champion of working-class interests.
Trump’s policies have included taxing university endowments and even suggesting we abolish the Department of Education altogether. This department manages crucial programs like the Pell Grant, which helps many students afford college. In fact, about 40% of higher education funding in the U.S. depends on federal support.
One puzzling element in this critique is the claim that colleges are “elite playgrounds.” Interestingly, both Trump and Vance graduated from Ivy League schools, which are among the most exclusive universities. Yet their attacks often focus on these elite institutions that enroll less than 0.5% of the nation’s undergraduate students.
Contrary to the current narrative, higher education has historically been a vital engine for social mobility in the United States. For example, Thomas Jefferson advocated for publicly funded universities, believing that education should be accessible to all, regardless of wealth or social status. This was a radical idea at the time, yet it inspired the creation of institutions that broadened access to education for various groups over the years.
Women’s colleges, which emerged in the 19th century, played a significant role in empowering women and eventually opened the door for them in traditionally male-dominated universities. Similarly, Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) offered educational opportunities to African Americans when mainstream institutions would not.
Recent research confirms that higher education still helps people rise out of poverty. According to a study by the Pew Charitable Trusts, adults from low-income families who attend college are about four times more likely to end up in the top income bracket. However, it’s essential to recognize that challenges remain. Low-income students often have less access to elite colleges, and enrollment at institutions that effectively promote upward mobility has declined over the past two decades.
If we want to address these issues, the answer is not less investment in education but more. Unfortunately, the push from the incoming administration seems to target programs meant to enhance diversity and equal opportunity. Given that college graduates have increasingly supported the Democratic Party, these moves might deepen the divide in socio-economic status rather than reduce it.
Ultimately, critiquing elite power shouldn’t mean tearing down the very institutions that can promote equality and opportunity. The real challenge lies in fostering a higher education system that works for everyone, and addressing the structural issues that prevent many from accessing quality education.
For more on the importance of college access and its impact on social mobility, you can check out this report from the Pew Charitable Trusts.