Five U.S. scientists recently joined a global team of 100 experts in Osaka, Japan, to work on a new report about climate change and urban areas, slated for release in 2027. Their involvement demonstrates that American researchers remain vital contributors in the field despite political headwinds.
Kevin Gurney, an atmospheric scientist who has participated in every prior assessment since 1990, emphasizes the importance of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). He finds it disheartening that world leaders have not acted decisively on climate warnings issued by the panel over the years. Gurney says he thought there would be a stronger response to the urgency of climate issues.
He shared concerns about how recent U.S. government actions that undermine climate science, such as firing key federal scientists and cutting programs, could hinder scientists’ ability to contribute effectively to this global effort. The American scientists attending the IPCC meeting are not compensated for their time; they volunteer, with travel costs often funded by government bodies of their respective nations.
“I would even self-fund my participation if necessary,” Gurney said, highlighting the critical need for scientific collaboration on climate issues.
While the Trump administration has not officially outlined future support for IPCC activities, the current environment poses uncertainty. Federal support has helped U.S. scientists attend meetings in the past, but that may change moving forward. Kristie Ebi, a public health researcher from the University of Washington, notes that funding for participation may have to come from private organizations or other sources. The non-participation of the U.S. affects its influence in shaping climate policies globally.
Despite difficulties, Ebi believes that American scientists will find ways to contribute. It’s vital for them to stay engaged, as their insights are essential for discussions about climate adaptation and response strategies. She noted that many scientists volunteer their time and expertise because they recognize the critical importance of the IPCC’s work. These assessments guide policy decisions on climate-related adaptations and mitigation strategies.
Climate change is already impacting cities, which produce about 70% of greenhouse gas emissions. Julie Arrighi, another U.S. scientist involved in the report, pointed out the significance of featuring urban areas separately in the upcoming IPCC documentation. More than half of the world’s population lives in cities, and this number is expected to rise. With cities facing increased climate risks, understanding their role in greenhouse gas emissions is imperative for developing effective strategies for climate resilience.
Gurney tracks emissions down to specific roadways and city blocks, allowing for better understanding and management of urban emissions. Research shows that two-thirds of greenhouse gas emissions originate from cities, making them critical in the fight against climate change. Adjustments at this scale have significant potential for impact.
As discussions around climate change grow more urgent, the importance of collaboration among scientists from around the world becomes even clearer. Keeping American scientists involved in international efforts like the IPCC can lead to better outcomes not only for the U.S. but for the global community. “If the U.S. doesn’t have a seat at the table, we risk making decisions without considering factors that could directly impact us,” asserted Ebi. The goal remains to protect our planet and ensure a sustainable future for generations to come.
Check out this related article: Transforming Tomorrow: County Council Launches Bold New Initiative to Combat Climate Change – Lichfield Live®
Source link