Why Sony is Rallying Against ‘Egregious’ Seedance 2.0 Infringement: Insights from ‘Breaking Bad’ and ‘Spider-Verse’ AI Clips

Admin

Why Sony is Rallying Against ‘Egregious’ Seedance 2.0 Infringement: Insights from ‘Breaking Bad’ and ‘Spider-Verse’ AI Clips

Sony Pictures is making waves in the tech and entertainment world by taking a stand against Seedance 2.0, a controversial Chinese video platform. This platform has sparked outrage from Hollywood due to its apparent use of AI to infringe on copyrights.

Recently, Sony sent a stern cease-and-desist letter to ByteDance, the parent company of Seedance. In it, they demanded that popular shows and movies, such as “Breaking Bad” and the “Spider-Verse” series, be removed from Seedance’s AI training data. Jill Ratner, general counsel for Sony Pictures, emphasized the seriousness of the situation, stating, “Given the egregious nature of Seedance 2.0’s outputs and the complete lack of observable copyright guardrails at launch, SPE can only conclude that ByteDance’s infringements are willful.”

Sony isn’t alone in its fight; Disney, Paramount, Warner Bros., and Netflix have all sent similar letters to ByteDance. Despite ByteDance’s promises to enhance copyright protections and safeguard actors’ likenesses, the uproar continues. Ratner insisted that half-hearted measures won’t suffice: “SPE will not tolerate delayed or half-baked measures.”

The stir caused by Seedance 2.0 is not limited to legal disputes. Clips from the platform have taken social media by storm, leading to creative mash-ups and fan-made content like alternate endings to “Game of Thrones” and engaging superhero battles. This trend highlights the fine line between homage and infringement in a digital age.

The Motion Picture Association also weighed in, with CEO Charles Rivkin urging ByteDance to halt its infringement practices. On the same day, Netflix issued a warning of “immediate litigation” if the situation doesn’t change. Other studios, including Disney and Warner Bros., are exploring legal actions against other AI platforms, MiniMax and Midjourney, as they navigate this uncharted territory.

Interestingly, these legal battles might take longer than expected. Serving paperwork to companies in China can be a complicated process, reportedly taking 18 to 24 months. This suggests that anyone looking to challenge ByteDance may face similar delays, complicating the timeline for resolution.

As AI technology evolves, so does the question of copyright and intellectual property. Experts suggest that this situation may set a precedent for how the industry manages AI and its relationship with creative content. The outcome of these disputes could reshape the future of media, offering a critical lesson in the balance between innovation and protection of original works.

For those wanting to learn more about the implications of AI in entertainment, the Motion Picture Association offers valuable insights and updates on industry standards and practices.



Source link

ByteDance,Seedance,Sony