The Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI(M)) expressed serious concerns over the recent interim trade agreement between India and the United States. They argue that this deal could significantly harm India’s economy, agriculture, and sovereignty.
CPI(M) leaders criticized the Modi government, suggesting that the agreement shouldn’t proceed without a thorough debate in Parliament. This framework aims to lower import duties on many goods to increase trade between the two countries, but according to the CPI(M), it reveals substantial concessions made by the Indian government to the U.S.
CPI(M) claims that the agreement might result in zero tariffs on U.S. exports of fruits, cotton, tree nuts, soybean oil, and various agricultural products. They warn this could harm local farmers. For instance, apple growers in states like Himachal Pradesh and Jammu and Kashmir may suffer further due to the deal, continuing a trend that began with previous agreements.
Additionally, cotton farmers, already facing rising costs and distress, might find it increasingly difficult to compete against heavily subsidized U.S. products. The CPI(M) has noted that the deal could remove non-tariff barriers that currently protect Indian farmers, leading to a dangerous rollback of support for the local agricultural sector.
The party is particularly worried about national sovereignty, alleging that the U.S. is influencing India’s policies, such as its oil imports from Russia. They see this as a troubling shift, prioritizing U.S. interests over India’s.
Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal responded to these concerns, asserting that proper safeguards are in place to protect local farmers and industries. He emphasized that the trade agreement would ultimately benefit Indian farmers, who currently export around $50-55 billion worth of agricultural products.
This conversation surrounding the trade deal underscores a larger debate in Indian society about globalization and its effects on local industries. As trade agreements become more common, the question remains: how can countries maintain their sovereignty while navigating global trade? The impact of such agreements will certainly continue to be a hot topic, with various social media reactions showcasing a range of public opinion.
For further details on the implications of trade agreements, you can read the World Trade Organization’s guidelines.
Understanding the nuances of such deals is crucial as they shape the economic landscape for millions of farmers and workers across the nation.
Source link
CPI, INDIA US TRADE DEAL, POLITBURO, CPI M SLAMS CENTRE, CPI M, THE LEFT PARTY SAID THE NARENDRA MODI GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT GO AHEAD WITH THE DEAL
