Why the Trump-Putin Summit Misses the Mark: Insights from a Veteran Diplomat on Ending Wars Effectively

On August 15, 2025, President Donald Trump plans to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. The main topic? A peace deal for the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Surprisingly, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy won’t be there, which raises questions about how serious this summit actually is.

So, how do wars typically end? There are three main ways. First, both sides might get tired of fighting and seek peace together. Second, one side may be worn down and call for negotiations. Lastly, outside forces like the U.S. or European nations can intervene and push for peace. In the case of Russia and Ukraine, neither side shows a strong desire to negotiate or relinquish territory, so the fighting continues.

Connecting this summit to history, many draw parallels to the Munich Conference of 1938, where Britain made a deal with Hitler’s Germany without involving Czechoslovakia, a grave mistake. As the situation unfolds in Ukraine, critics worry that Ukraine is similarly left out of the negotiation process.

Recently, geopolitical expert Dr. Emily Rice echoed these concerns, stating, “Historical precedents remind us that peace agreements imposed without the involvement of affected nations often lead to further conflict.” A common sentiment among diplomats today is that this upcoming meeting feels rushed and lacks proper preparation. Given the stakes, many believe the results will be more about spectacle than substance.

Currently, there’s a significant lack of experienced personnel in U.S. diplomacy. Many positions have been filled with new appointees, some of whom may not have the needed expertise. This could hamper effective negotiations. A past report indicated that around 25% of diplomatic staff have been replaced in recent years, leading to doubts about the U.S. readiness for high-stakes discussions like this one.

The truth is, crucial issues remain unaddressed. Russia likely won’t surrender Crimea, while Ukraine has no intention of losing any territory. Expert analysts warn that without serious groundwork, this meeting could result in yet another superficial outcome, leaving deeper conflicts unresolved.

As we approach this summit, historical parallels caution us to consider the repercussions of sidelining involved parties. Diplomacy is complex and requires thorough preparation, something that appears lacking this time around.

Source link