Why Trump’s Withdrawal from the W.H.O. Could Spell Disaster for Global Health Initiatives

The United States has played a vital role in global health for many years. However, recent moves by former President Trump toward isolationism raise concerns. On his first day in office, he signed an executive order to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO), an effort he had previously attempted during his first term until President Biden reversed it. This withdrawal could hinder America’s ability to respond to global health crises.

Many critical components of medicine come from other countries, especially ingredients for drugs, with around 60 percent sourced from India and China. If the U.S. imposes high tariffs on these imports, it may severely impact the domestic production of medicines. This situation highlights why Americans’ health is closely tied to global health efforts.

Infectious diseases do not respect borders. To protect public health, the U.S. must engage internationally, sharing vaccinations, training healthcare providers worldwide, and working together on research. These collaborations are essential for effective outbreak containment and eventual eradication of numerous diseases. The leadership of the U.S. in these areas is critical.

American contributions to global health are also considered a form of smart diplomacy. Even countries with strained relations seek U.S. medical expertise because health security is intertwined with national security and economic stability. Unfortunately, during Trump’s first term, the U.S. reduced its involvement in vital global health initiatives, leaving the nation less prepared for responses like the COVID-19 pandemic, which had devastating global effects.

Since World War II, the U.S. has excelled in global health thanks to various agencies, such as the Department of Health and Human Services and USAID. Numerous non-profits, including the Gates Foundation, have also supported these efforts. Much of this work has occurred within the framework of the WHO, which facilitates international cooperation on health challenges, from preventing pandemics to addressing maternal health issues.

American leadership is paramount. For example, the U.S. played a key role in updating the 2005 International Health Regulations, which establish protocols for the 196 countries involved. These updates aim to enhance the WHO’s ability to respond to pandemics. This leadership extends to engaging with other countries on pressing health topics like tuberculosis and antimicrobial resistance during recent United Nations General Assembly meetings.

To sum up, the health of Americans relies heavily on a proactive stance towards global health. Active participation in international health efforts not only promotes safety at home but also fosters broader diplomatic ties around the world.