Why UCLA Must Stand Firm Against Government Interference to Protect Higher Education Principles

Many years ago, I attempted entrance exams for graduate studies in Iran—twice, and both times I faced rejection. The first time, I was left in the dark about the reason. The second rejection came with a note from the Ministry of Higher Education, stating I hadn’t aligned with the country’s “official” values.

I decided to leave Iran for the United States, where I completed a master’s degree on the East Coast. Later, I moved to Los Angeles after getting accepted into doctoral programs at UCLA and USC.

In the U.S., I discovered that education is about more than just academics. It promotes critical thinking, social awareness, and community engagement—elements missing from my earlier experiences. Students are encouraged to become informed and engaged citizens.

I also learned about the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech and due process. These rights mean that no one should suffer for their beliefs, yet recent events suggest changes are afoot.

Recently, some students have faced restrictions on their participation in university activities. International students have seen their visas revoked due to their opinions. For example, a Tufts University student wrote an op-ed and subsequently lost their visa. Others have been detained not for actions, but for their beliefs, as noted in a government memo about a Columbia University graduate.

It feels as if the oppressive narratives of the past are resurfacing. Universities are now pressured to align with government agendas that threaten academic freedom. Schools respond in different ways. Some, like Columbia, comply readily. Others, like Harvard, resist, advocating for the principles that support higher education.

In support of Harvard’s stance, hundreds of university leaders signed a letter against governmental overreach, stating, “We speak with one voice against the unprecedented government overreach now endangering American higher education.”

At UCLA, 19 international students experienced visa revocations, though they were later restored. In another incident, a graduate student faced detention at the border. Unfortunately, the university hasn’t actively supported those affected or condemned these troubling policies. A recent town hall on immigration yielded no specific plans to protect students.

Remarkably, UCLA’s leaders were absent from the initial list of signatories against government interference. However, they have since joined, contributing to a growing coalition of over 600 university leaders advocating for academic freedom.

Responses from university communities have also surfaced. Many are urging their institutions to publicly oppose government demands. A recent “speak out” event at Columbia demonstrated a united front within the community.

UCLA should stand firm against those compromising students’ rights and align with universities defending freedom. The values that guide education are too vital to be sacrificed under pressure.

As Nelson Mandela profoundly stated, “Education is the most powerful weapon we can use to change the world.” Let’s harness that power to uphold the values of higher education.

In conclusion, the landscape of education is changing, and as students, faculty, and advocates, we must engage actively. Together, we can ensure that the ideals of academic freedom persist and thrive in our institutions.



Source link