We are disappointed to learn that Brown has reached a deal with the Trump administration to restore federal research funding, which opens the door to compliance reviews. For months, President Christina Paxson and the University have appealed to alumni for support against government pressures. They emphasized the significance of defending academic freedom, believing Brown would uphold the values we cherished during our time there.
Paxson’s recent letter suggests she still stands by these principles. However, by signing this agreement, she contradicts the commitment to academic freedom. It allows the government to influence how the university allocates funds and manages programs, raising concerns about the autonomy of Brown.
What is the point of increased funding if it comes at the cost of freedom in how that money is used? According to Brown’s mission statement, the University should create an environment where everyone can thrive. However, agreeing to this deal undermines the safety and well-being of vulnerable groups, especially transgender and non-binary individuals, and racial minorities. In a time of escalating discrimination, Brown should be a sanctuary for all, rather than compromising its community’s security.
This agreement also threatens the Open Curriculum, a hallmark of Brown’s educational philosophy. Paxson previously argued that protecting academic freedom is crucial for allowing students and faculty to choose their paths of study. Yet, under this new deal, anonymous surveys can now report faculty for alleged offenses, complicating the delicate environment of academic debate. While combating anti-Semitism is important, using anonymous reports to target professors based on political views risks silencing diverse ideas.
In the quest for more funding, the University seems to be sacrificing its core values. There’s a fear that this could lead to further concessions that erode the very essence of what makes Brown special. We can’t ignore the possibility that more demands from the administration could follow.
Interesting to note, recent surveys indicate an increased concern among students regarding academic freedom, especially in polarized political climates. A recent study found that 70% of students believe free expression on campus is essential, yet many report feeling uncomfortable voicing controversial opinions. This growing anxiety reflects a broader trend in educational institutions where the balance between political correctness and open dialogue is increasingly contentious.
As alumni, we feel strongly that our University should be a beacon of free thought and inclusion. We hope the administration will reconsider this agreement, keeping Brown’s integrity and community values in mind.
