After securing a one-time funding boost of $45 million from the state, Sonoma State University (SSU) faced more uncertainties regarding its athletics program. While $8 million was earmarked specifically for NCAA Division II sports over the next three years, the university’s interim president, Emily Cutrer, announced plans that left many disappointed.
Just one day after the funding announcement, Cutrer informed the community that SSU would not offer NCAA sports in the 2025-26 school year. Instead, she revealed a plan to form a working group aimed at exploring long-term solutions to revitalize the athletics program. This group will consist of students, faculty, and experts and is expected to provide insights by January 2026.
Supporters of SSU athletics were taken aback by this news. The funding, according to Assemblymember Chris Rogers, was clearly designated for NCAA sports, with no room for alternative uses. He expressed hope for the revival of some athletic programs but criticized the university for its lack of a concrete plan.
Senate President Mike McGuire, who played a significant role in securing the state funds, emphasized that the budget allocations are legally binding and must be used accordingly. He stated, “The university has to spend the funding as it was intended.”
Many involved in SSU athletics, including coaches, are concerned about the administration’s lack of focus on restoring NCAA sports. For instance, Marcus Ziemer, the men’s soccer coach, expressed skepticism about Cutrer’s intentions, suggesting that her wording hinted at a shift toward club sports rather than a full revival of NCAA athletics.
In the wake of these announcements, the challenge to reestablish a robust athletics program is significant. SSU will need to hire coaching staff, an athletic director, and attract enough student-athletes to meet NCAA membership requirements. This task has become even more complex as many current student-athletes have already transferred to other schools.
According to the National Governing Body for Collegiate Athletics, many universities are facing similar challenges due to budget cuts and shifts in student engagement. As of 2023, a study noted that nearly 40% of college athletic programs nationwide have reduced their offerings or eliminated teams altogether as schools reassess their financial priorities.
The conversation surrounding SSU’s athletics reflects broader trends in college sports, where financial sustainability often clashes with the passion for competitive teams. The outcome of SSU’s plan could influence how other institutions approach their athletic programs in the future.
In summary, while the recent financial support offers a glimmer of hope for SSU athletics, the path forward remains unclear. The proposed working group could shape the future of sports at the university, but skepticism persists among supporters who worry about the commitment to Division II athletics.

















