Behind the Curtain: How Industries Influence Laws and Science to Stall Climate Action

Oil companies funding museum exhibits, pesticide manufacturers sponsoring scientific conferences—these aren’t just isolated incidents; they highlight a troubling trend called ‘capture strategies.’ This web of influence threatens to undermine our efforts to tackle climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution.

A study led by Professor Alex Ford from the University of Portsmouth sheds light on this issue. The research, published in Environmental Science & Technology Letters, reveals how industries manipulate everything from government regulations to university research under the radar. According to Ford, “Those responsible for protecting people and the planet can get caught up in a web where funding and decision-making are controlled by corporate interests.”

This situation is urgent. As the UN warns of a “triple planetary crisis,” with climate change at the forefront, these influence tactics are slowing necessary responses.

Understanding Capture Strategies

Capture strategies involve swaying individuals or organizations to favor corporate interests over public health and the environment. This isn’t limited to lobbying. The study highlights how universities can become compromised—often termed ‘Frackademia’—when they accept fossil fuel money. Museums, facing budget shortfalls, may present a less stark view of climate issues if backed by oil companies.

An example of this is the Deepwater Horizon disaster in 2010, which exposed how too-close relationships between regulators and the oil industry led to catastrophic consequences. Regulators relied on industry data instead of enforcing strict safety measures.

The study also points to subtler examples. Pesticide companies sponsor conferences that focus heavily on their products, while discussions about their dangers are often sidelined. Even social media has its role, amplifying misinformation on climate and health, like the $1 billion annual revenue generated by the anti-vaccine movement on these platforms.

The Influence Playbook

Researchers have put together a ‘playbook’ of tactics used by corporations, aiming to control research and educational materials. Academic institutions, reliant on funding, face pressure to avoid publishing negative results about their sponsors. This creates an environment where accountability can fade away.

Ford emphasizes that these tactics aren’t always corrupt but are deeply entrenched and systemic. For instance, even organizations like the World Wildlife Fund have faced backlash for accepting funds from major corporations, potentially affecting their advocacy.

While the private sector can spur innovation and support environmental causes, transparency is essential. Dr. Maria Clara Starling, a co-author of the study, notes that corporate involvement must prioritize public and environmental well-being.

Countermeasures and the Path Forward

The study suggests remedies like stronger conflict of interest policies and education about influence tactics. It’s important to inform university students, particularly in environmental studies, about the dangers of disinformation.

This investigation follows Ford’s earlier research on how England’s water industry avoids accountability for sewage pollution. The broader implications point to a society increasingly influenced by corporate power, sometimes overshadowing civil rights.

To address this imbalance, the first step is recognition. The researchers argue that bringing these issues to light can diminish their effectiveness, empowering the public to advocate for much-needed change.

The discussion is far from over, and understanding these tactics is crucial in building a healthier society and a sustainable planet.

For more insights, you can read the full study here.

Source link