Join the Fight: Climate Activists Take Legal Action to Halt Fossil Fuel Expansion This Week – Daily Montanan

In 2023, a landmark climate change case, Held v. Montana, saw 16 young Montanans challenge the state for not providing them with a “clean and healthful environment,” a right guaranteed by Montana’s constitution. This decision was a rallying point for youth nationwide, raising awareness that their future is at stake. Despite this victory, Montana’s energy policies remain largely unchanged, with significant coal, oil, and gas reserves still in play.

A significant next step for the plaintiffs came when they sought to block several executive orders from President Donald Trump that they argue threaten their health and future. They claim these orders will lead to almost 200,000 additional deaths over the next 25 years and increase health issues like respiratory problems. Their group includes youth from other states, supported by the nonprofit Our Children’s Trust.

One of the plaintiffs, Eva Lighthiser, expressed her frustration, saying, “I am not suing because I want to, I am suing because I have to.” She highlighted that climate change has intensified problems like wildfire smoke and flooding.

The case’s core argument is that fossil fuel development infringes on their Fifth Amendment rights—life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—by harming their health and environment. Lighthiser’s case builds on the Montana Supreme Court’s recent ruling in favor of their right to a healthy environment.

Montana’s Attorney General, Austin Knudsen, argues against the plaintiffs, claiming they lack the standing to sue. He states that the energy policies are crucial for the state’s economy.

A hearing is set to take place, where a federal judge will consider the motion to dismiss and also assess the request to halt Trump’s energy-related orders.

Olivia Vesovich, another plaintiff and a college senior, speaks to her struggles with severe allergies and asthma, worsened by climate change. “My eyes were swollen shut every single day,” she recounted. Research shows that rising temperatures often exacerbate pollen counts, making allergies more challenging.

A vital point in their legal argument is that the rights to a safe climate under Montana law should also be protected federally. Our Children’s Trust has previously pursued broader climate cases, including the notable Juliana v. the United States, where young plaintiffs argued that their future is being compromised by government inaction on climate change.

Should the plaintiffs find success in this case, it could set a crucial legal precedent, expanding their rights and further empowering youth activism across the country. This case highlights the generational divide over climate change policies. Young people are increasingly vocal, using social media to share their experiences and frustrations, and urging for significant policy changes.

According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a warming planet threatens not only the environment but public health as well. The emergence of weather-related illnesses, such as mosquito-borne diseases, illustrates how pressing these issues are. “The data are clear,” said Kristie Ebi, a global health professor. “There’s a long list of adverse health outcomes from a warming world.”

As this case unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the urgency behind climate advocacy and the need for a conversation about environmental responsibility, health risks, and the rights of future generations.

For more detailed perspectives on the health impacts of climate change, you can visit this IPCC report.

Source link

Eva Lighthiser,held v montana,Lighthiser,lighthiser v. trump