Trump’s Tough Talk on China: Can a Trade War Truce Be Achieved?

Donald Trump recently stirred up tensions with China over its export controls on rare earths. He announced a 100% tariff on imports from China, creating waves of concern. However, instead of immediate action, these tariffs will take effect on November 1. This delay suggests Trump wants to leave room for negotiation with President Xi Jinping, even though he previously indicated that a meeting at the Apec forum might not happen.

When asked about possible changes from China, Trump responded cautiously, indicating that he would “see what happens” by the November deadline. Some critics interpreted his decision to postpone as a sign of weakness, calling it a “mega Taco,” suggesting he might back down when pressured by China.

The White House was taken aback by China’s sudden export controls, which came just weeks before Trump’s anticipated meeting with Xi. China now requires foreign firms to get approval to export rare earth materials, which adds another layer of complexity to the trade relationship. Trump labeled these controls as “very hostile” and mentioned that other countermeasures are on the table.

In a twist, his reaction invigorated some within his administration who have long advocated for a tougher stance against China. After previous complaints about Trump’s inclination toward diplomacy, these officials felt a sense of vindication. Wendy Cutler from the Asia Society pointed out that hawks in the administration were relieved to see Trump ready to adopt a harder line.

Recent statistics highlight the stakes of the ongoing U.S.-China trade rivalry. A report from the U.S. Trade Representative showed that trade in rare earth materials was valued at nearly $1.3 billion in 2022. The potential disruption of this trade could ripple through industries that rely on these crucial materials, from tech to defense.

Experts offer diverse opinions on whether China’s bold move will backfire. Some believe Xi’s strategy could be a miscalculation, as many in Washington see this as a betrayal rather than leverage. Craig Singleton from the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies argues that China’s actions could provoke a stronger U.S. response.

Some voices in Congress are calling for legislation to address these tensions. John Moolenaar, the Republican chair of the House China committee, noted that China’s actions pose a significant threat to the U.S. economy, urging Congress to act decisively.

On the other side, trade lawyer Nazak Nikakhtar believes China might not yield this time. Xi and his administration could see the current U.S. market struggles as an opportunity to stand firm. Nikakhtar noted that past tariffs had already affected U.S. markets, making it less likely for China to back down under pressure.

In contrast, Wang Wen, a political expert from Renmin University, is optimistic that negotiations will eventually resolve tensions. He emphasized that China has become used to what he calls “paper tiger” behavior from the U.S., implying that it often shows strength without follow-through.

In conclusion, the situation is fluid, with both sides preparing for potential escalations. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining whether these tariffs lead to a deeper conflict or open pathways for negotiation.



Source link