Sara Carlson, a mother of three from Rochester, Minnesota, faced tough times two decades ago after a personal crisis left her newly single. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), once known as food stamps, was a lifeline for her, providing essential food supplies for her family.
“I wouldn’t have been able to afford to live,” she reflects. Today, she works as an operations manager and helps at Channel One Regional Food Bank, promoting food access in her community.
However, after a couple of years, she lost her SNAP benefits because her income increased. Unfortunately, millions could find themselves in a similar position soon. Current estimates suggest that nearly 42 million Americans might see their benefits cut off if the government shutdown continues and SNAP funding runs dry on November 1.
The situation escalated partly due to previous budget cuts, notably the One Big Beautiful Bill Act from Donald Trump, which slashed about $187 billion from SNAP until 2024, as reported by the Congressional Budget Office.
Joel Berg, CEO of Hunger Free America, warns, “We will have the greatest hunger catastrophe in America since the Great Depression, and I don’t say that lightly.”
SNAP provides crucial support to low-wage workers, seniors, and people with disabilities. Typically, participants must earn below 130% of the federal poverty line, receiving about $187 monthly. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has already issued warnings about possible funding shortages, and over 200 House Democrats are urging the USDA to use contingency funds to maintain benefits.
Despite this, political disagreements are complicating matters. Democrats are pushing for healthcare subsidies under the Affordable Care Act, which were cut during the Trump administration and are set to expire soon. According to recent data, millions rely on these subsidies, many of whom also depend on SNAP. The ongoing discussions highlight the interconnectedness of healthcare and food assistance in America.
Brittany, a 38-year-old home health nurse from Kentucky, speaks to these challenges directly. She’s worked hard, balancing 35 to 40 hours a week and still receiving SNAP. “It’s not like I receive benefits and don’t work,” she clarifies. For Brittany, SNAP is crucial, allowing her to cover monthly necessities while still finding time for her family.
If the funding halts, she fears having to work weekends, impacting her time with her children. Ironically, while she feels for those facing potential hunger, she holds Republicans accountable for the situation, reflecting a complex web of political beliefs in economic realities.
As discussions continue, experts emphasize that SNAP is more than just a safety net; it’s vital for millions of families striving to make ends meet. The ramifications of funding cuts extend beyond statistics—they impact real lives. Amid the political tussle, the voices of everyday Americans highlight the urgent need for stable food assistance during these critical times.
For deeper insights into SNAP and its importance, check out the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities for more updated research and information.


















