Major Restructuring at Health and Human Services: 10,000 Jobs at Risk and Agency Closures Ahead

In a significant shakeup, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is cutting 10,000 jobs and closing several agencies. This reorganization has sparked concerns about the impact on health services for millions across the nation.

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. criticized the department as an inefficient "sprawling bureaucracy." In a video announcing the changes, he promised that the department would do more with less. He highlighted a pressing issue: Americans’ health has not improved, despite a huge budget of $1.7 trillion. Kennedy pointed out that chronic diseases and cancer rates remain high, and previous efforts have failed to drive significant change.

Health experts and various stakeholders quickly expressed alarm about these cuts. Brian Ronholm, director of food policy at Consumer Reports, stated that the layoffs could compromise public health and food safety. He suggested that these cuts could turn the administration’s health improvement promises into empty words.

Kennedy’s plan, described as a necessary restructuring, includes centralizing control over agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This shift raises concerns since these agencies typically operate independently. For instance, the NIH has been instrumental in advancing cancer treatments, contributing to a 34% decline in cancer death rates over the last twenty years. These improvements highlight the need for a robust public health system instead of one faced with cutbacks.

Workers within HHS reported anxiety and fear about the future. Many were caught off guard by the announcement of layoffs and uncertain about their job security. The FDA alone will lose 3,500 positions, impacting its ability to inspect food and drugs—critical services that directly affect public health.

Additionally, Kennedy plans to dissolve agencies created by Congress, such as the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). This agency plays a crucial role in addressing addiction and mental health issues. Keith Humphreys, a Stanford University addiction expert, criticized the move, arguing that it threatens vital support for communities dealing with substance abuse.

With these changes, public health advocates fear a reduction in services will lead to poorer health outcomes. For instance, over 13 million Americans rely on community health centers for their basic health needs. Cutting funding to such places could mean fewer resources for underserved populations.

Some experts believe that instead of cutting jobs, the focus should be on reforming how resources are utilized. A recent study by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that inefficiencies within health systems could be addressed through better management practices rather than layoffs.

The restructuring emphasizes the urgency of understanding how these decisions will shape healthcare in America. As Sen. Patty Murray pointed out, reducing staff in key agencies won’t make Americans healthier; it will likely lead to longer wait times for treatments and services.

As this situation evolves, it will be vital to monitor how the restructuring affects the nation’s health landscape. Whether these cuts result in more effective healthcare delivery or hinder public health remains to be seen.

For more insights and updates on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, visit AP News.

Source link

Mike Rounds, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Donald Trump, Labor, Public health, Medical research, General news, DC Wire, Health, Addiction and treatment, Government programs, Brian Ronholm, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Washington news, George W. Bush, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Medical devices, Jobs and careers, Jeffrey Grant, Keith Humphreys, Medical

Check out this related article: Live Updates: Stock Futures Hold Steady as Traders Await Key Inflation Data from the Fed