Cornell University Student Speaks Out After Trump Targeting: Decides to Leave the US

A Cornell University graduate student, Momodou Taal, has left the US after facing deportation due to his protest activities against Israel during the ongoing Israel-Gaza conflict. This decision came after a judge rejected his appeal to delay his removal. Taal, who holds dual citizenship in the UK and The Gambia, chose to depart on his own terms, stating he felt unsafe and lost faith in the legal system to protect his rights to express his beliefs.

Taal’s activism led to his suspension twice from Cornell, prompting his visa revocation. On social media, he shared his struggles, saying, "I took the decision to leave on my own terms." His statements reflect a growing concern among international students about the US government’s crackdown on political dissent, particularly related to pro-Palestinian activities.

He’s not alone in this experience. Reports indicate that around 300 university students have had their visas revoked for participating in similar protests, according to Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The Trump administration’s approach stems from an executive order aimed at addressing what it labels as antisemitism, which has sparked significant debate about free speech on campus.

Experts argue that these actions pose risks to academic freedom. Dr. Laura McLean, a political scientist, comments, “When students are punished for their beliefs, it undermines the open discourse that universities are meant to promote.”

Another student, Ranjani Srinivasan from India, also chose to leave the US rather than face deportation. She described her situation as unjust, insisting she does not support terrorism; she’s just a regular student pursuing her education. She hopes to return to Columbia University to complete her PhD.

School administrations and activists are divided on this issue. Some argue that the administration’s actions protect national security, while others view these deportations as a chilling effect on free speech and political expression in academic settings.

This situation highlights the tension between national security and freedom of expression, raising critical questions about the rights of international students in the US. As universities become battlegrounds for political beliefs, the debate over academic freedom and the treatment of dissenting voices will likely continue to evolve.

Sources:

• The Cornell Daily Sun
• CNN

Check out this related article: Discover How Howard University President Ben Vinson Unpacks ‘Artificial Intelligence in an Age After Reason’ at MIT Lecture