Supreme Court: The Supreme Court on Thursday (December 19) said that harassing ladies within the title of witchcraft is a stain on the constitutional spirit. The Supreme Court condemned the order staying proceedings towards a person accused of stripping and harassing ladies within the title of witchcraft.
A bench of Justice CT Ravikumar and Justice Sanjay Karol. described the case as based mostly on disturbing details. The bench said that if the dignity of an individual is compromised, his human rights are in danger, which he enjoys by advantage of being a human being and is assured beneath varied nationwide and worldwide acts. >
‘A stain on constitutional sentiment’
Referring to National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) information in instances associated to witchcraft, the bench said that every case on constitutional sentiment There was a stain. He said, "Witchcraft, which one of the victims has been accused of, is definitely a practice that should be stayed away from. Such allegations have a long history and often lead to tragic consequences for those accused."
The bench said, ‘Witchcraft is deeply related to superstition, patriarchy and social management. Therefore, it isn’t stunning that such allegations have been usually made towards ladies who’re both widows or aged.’
Know what’s the entire matter
In March 2020, in Champaran district of Bihar, 13 folks attacked an outdated girl accusing her of witchcraft. During this time, the accused tore the witch’s saree whereas saying that they might strip her bare and parade her round. The accused additionally attacked one other girl who got here to intervene. The police had filed a cost sheet, of which the Justice of the Peace had taken cognizance. However, rejecting the petition filed by the accused, the High Court stayed the proceedings
Patna HC had put the keep
The bench said that Champaran in Bihar An FIR was lodged towards 13 folks within the district, however the police filed a cost sheet solely towards Lakhpati Devi. The trial court docket took cognizance towards Lakhpati and others named within the FIR on July 16, 2022. The accused had approached the Patna High Court with a request to quash the case filed towards them. On July 4, the High Court had directed to remain the proceedings towards the accused within the decrease court docket.
‘It is an insult to the dignity of the sufferer’
< p>Aggrieved by the keep order handed by the High Court, the complainant approached the apex court docket, which was knowledgeable on November 26 that the petition in search of quashing of the cognizance order had been withdrawn on November 22. The SC said that the FIR states that the sufferer was publicly assaulted and abused, which was undoubtedly an insult to her dignity. He additionally took cognizance of ‘sure different acts’ towards the sufferer, which shocked his conscience as such acts have been happening within the twenty first century.
Source link
