The recent storm in Delhi caught many off guard, including the India Meteorological Department (IMD). They noted that predicting such sudden weather changes is challenging. Factors like shifting weather patterns make it tough to forecast accurately. To improve predictions, the IMD insists on denser weather monitoring systems and advanced analytical tools. After all, understanding local climate impacts is crucial for sectors like agriculture and business.

However, climate change isn’t waiting for these improvements. The World Meteorological Organization’s 2023 State of the Global Climate Report reveals alarming trends: record-high temperatures and carbon dioxide levels are leading to more frequent and intense extreme weather events worldwide.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) also emphasizes this risk in its 2025 Global Risks Report. It categorizes extreme weather as one of the foremost risks in the coming years, highlighting environmental concerns as pressing issues facing humanity. In fact, four out of the top five risks identified are tied to environmental factors.
Interestingly, there appears to be a generational divide regarding these concerns. The Edelman Trust Barometer shows that many younger people fear for the future, believing that subsequent generations will face worse conditions. Overall, 80% of respondents in developed nations share this sentiment, while globally, the figure drops to around 40%. In India, it stands at 66%—still a significant concern.
Amid these challenges, there’s growing frustration towards businesses and government entities. Many respondents feel that corporations are not doing enough to tackle critical issues like climate change and affordability. Approximately 70% believe CEOs should take action on issues related to their business’s negative impacts on society.
Given this tense landscape, businesses face a complex scenario. They must navigate an unstable environment marked by climate change, supply chain disruptions, and societal expectations. Trust in corporate leadership is waning, as many fear that their companies won’t prioritize ethical decision-making.
Businesses need a strategy to adapt. Rather than merely preparing for predictable scenarios, they must build resilience in an uncertain world. Key strategies might include:
- Short vs. Long-Term Focus: Determine whether initiatives should target immediate needs or long-term stability since the approaches will differ greatly.
- Understanding Instability: Assess which factors causing disruption are short-lived versus those that will persist, adapting strategies accordingly.
The environmental risks highlighted by the WEF call for urgent attention. With public expectation rising for corporate accountability, it’s essential for businesses to evaluate their strategies for minimizing environmental risks. Achieving this requires a supportive policy framework, placing pressure on industry groups to advocate for broader environmental and social reforms.
Finally, preparation is crucial. Effective stakeholder engagement can be a weak point for many businesses. Internally, companies should ensure that employees are informed and prepared, fostering trust and openness about future plans. Externally, businesses need to demonstrate leadership by engaging transparently with their communities.
In conclusion, companies must brace for the unexpected and actively engage with their environment. By doing so, they can tackle risks effectively and foster a more sustainable future.
Author: Independent expert on climate change and clean energy.
Check out this related article: Standing Committee on Environment, Food, and Agriculture Pledges Support for COP17 Budget: What It Means for Our Planet
Source linkIndia Meteorological Department,World Meteorological Organization,State of the Global Climate Report,World Economic Forum,Global Risks Report,Edelman Trust Barometer,extreme weather events,climate change impact,environmental risk management,generational divide,societal polarization,business resilience,supply chain disruption,global policy uncertainty,stakeholder engagement,CEO responsibility,environmental lobbying,trust in business,employee trust erosion,sustainable leadership