Comparing Pakistan Army’s Propaganda and Indian Army’s Professionalism: Insights for Strategic Analysis

During a recent press conference on April 29, Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Choudhary, the Director General of the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) for the Pakistan Army, introduced the term “state-sponsored cross-border terrorism” to criticize India. This language is part of a long tradition of the ISPR using information tactics to distract from Pakistan’s own history of sponsoring terrorism. Other narratives, like those under #IIOJK and #DigitalTerrorists, have aimed to shift focus from the internal and external challenges Pakistan faces.

However, Lt Gen Choudhary’s accusations didn’t gain traction. Many in the global community now view the Indian Army as a responsible, apolitical entity that operates within India’s constitutional framework. This contrasts sharply with the Pakistan Army, which is often seen using militant proxies to achieve its political goals.

Pakistan Army’s Troubling Legacy

The Pakistan Army has long acted as more than just a military force; it has served as a powerful political entity. Here are some key areas reflecting its influence:

• Political Interference: The army has repeatedly meddled in politics, from the intimidation of leaders to manipulating elections and marginalizing opponents like Imran Khan.

• Media Suppression: Journalists in Pakistan face significant risks, including abduction. The state frequently censors media, indicating a fear of truth.

• Internal Repression: Events like the Islamabad massacre and the suppression of voices in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa show a pattern of military force against its own citizens.

In terms of cross-border terrorism, the Pakistan Army has a long history, which includes:

• The 1947-48 invasions of Kashmir.
• Continuous support for various insurgent groups in India.
• Direct involvement in high-profile terrorist attacks like the 2008 Mumbai attacks and recent violence in Pahalgam, where named army operatives are accused.

Despite India providing undeniable evidence of Pakistan’s involvement in these activities, Pakistan continues to deny responsibility.

Why Now?

The press conference served several purposes:

1. Shifting Blame: By accusing India of actions it is itself guilty of, Pakistan aims to level the narrative and maintain morale within its ranks.

2. Internal Cohesion: Facing scrutiny over military leadership, the conference seeks to rally support and distract from governance issues at home.

3. Creating Confusion: Amid rising evidence of its own military’s involvement in terrorism, Pakistan aims to muddle global perceptions and buy time against international criticism.

Comparing Forces: Indian Army vs. Pakistan Army

The Indian Army is a respected national institution, operating under civilian control and reflecting India’s diversity. In contrast, the Pakistan Army is perceived as dominated by one ethnic group, fostering discontent in regions like Balochistan and Sindh.

While the Pakistan Army struggles with internal dissent and factional issues, the Indian Army maintains public trust and operational success.

The Bigger Picture

The ISPR’s criticisms illustrate a tactic of psychological projection as Pakistan faces growing internal and external criticisms. In contrast, India finds strength in its military, diplomatic, and moral stature.

The global audience is paying close attention, with the contrasts between the two nations continuing to emerge.

For further insights on current geopolitical tensions, consider exploring resources by the Council on Foreign Relations here.

Check out this related article: Strengthening Bonds: Indian Delegation in Cairo to Enhance Defence Ties with Egypt

Source link

Block Home Page,BN,Indian Army,Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR),ISPR,ISPR DG LT Gen Ahmed Sharif Choudhary,Pakistan Army