DOJ Targets College Diversity Initiatives: False Claims Act Enforcement Explained

American universities are facing significant changes due to the Trump administration’s actions against diversity initiatives. Recently, the Department of Justice announced plans to use a civil anti-fraud law to possibly withdraw federal funding from colleges that promote diversity and inclusion.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche explained that the False Claims Act would be used when federal contractors violate civil rights laws. This could involve schools allowing antisemitism on campus or permitting transgender women to participate in sports or use restrooms that match their gender identity. The memo from the DOJ also states that universities cannot have programs that favor or disadvantage people based on race or ethnicity.

The approach includes seeking fines and damages for institutions found to be in violation, and in severe cases, even pursuing criminal charges. The False Claims Act has been around since the Civil War and allows the government to recover funds lost due to fraud.

This new push is part of a broader campaign against diversity efforts. For example, the Education Department has recently warned 60 colleges about investigations concerning antisemitic harassment. These actions come alongside threats to withhold vital education funding.

Experts in higher education are expressing concern. Jodie Ferise, a higher education attorney, noted the confusion among institutions trying to navigate these shifting regulations. Universities that previously used their diversity efforts as a recruitment tool are now being told to downplay them. Ferise highlighted that transparency efforts are crucial for attracting a diverse faculty and student body, and it’s disappointing that colleges might have to abandon those initiatives.

The attorney general has made it clear that promoting diversity could put universities’ federal funding at risk. Many schools have already begun making changes, such as terminating diversity programs or altering hiring practices. Yet, these changes haven’t completely shielded them from funding cuts.

Harvard University recently renamed its diversity office to the Office of Community and Campus Life in an effort to regain over $2 billion in frozen federal funds. However, even after this move, the Trump administration announced additional funding cuts.

In another twist, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has opened an investigation into whether Harvard’s diversity practices could be deemed discriminatory. This investigation ties back to a response regarding admissions practices and compliance with the Supreme Court’s ruling on affirmative action.

This situation presents a complex landscape for universities. The push against diversity initiatives may reshape the future of education in the U.S., creating an environment where schools face serious consequences for promoting inclusivity.

For more information on the False Claims Act, you can check the Department of Justice’s official website.

Source link