Montanans are grappling with a sharp backlash against a Supreme Court ruling. This ruling emphasizes that the Montana Constitution guarantees “a clean and healthful environment for present and future generations.” It’s puzzling to see opposition to something so vital.
Why would anyone want a polluted and unsafe environment for themselves or their children? Yet, the court’s decision has sparked a misplaced revolt against the very laws designed to protect our health and safety. Some are even portraying the judiciary as an enemy when, in reality, its role is to uphold the rights of the people.
The Supreme Court’s job is to ensure that state laws align with the Constitution. This system of checks and balances is crucial. It keeps the executive and legislative branches in line, safeguarding our rights.
Attacking our environment leads us down a dangerous path. The consequences of pollution are mounting, costing us billions to clean up. So, why protect polluters at the expense of everyone else?
Here’s a reality check: pollution affects us all, regardless of our political beliefs. Clean air and water are essential for everyone. We all share the responsibility to ensure these resources remain unpolluted for future generations.
Fortunately, Montana has strong environmental laws that benefit us all. There’s no justifiable reason for any political faction to oppose these protections.
One challenging aspect of the environmental movement is its close association with the Democratic Party. In Montana’s past, some Democratic governors made poor environmental choices. For instance, in the 1980s, Governor Ted Schwinden halved the coal severance tax, hoping to boost the coal industry but ultimately losing millions for our trust funds without saving the industry.
Similarly, Governor Brian Schweitzer tried to reinvigorate the coal sector with questionable plans, even as cheaper energy sources emerged. And Governor Steve Bullock allowed radioactive waste from fracking to be dumped in our landfills when it was banned in neighboring North Dakota.
Republicans have also made their share of questionable decisions, but that’s another topic entirely.
A clean environment shouldn’t be a partisan issue. Montana’s beauty lies in its pristine rivers, clear skies, and rich wildlife. Our Constitution clearly states: “The state and each person shall maintain and improve a clean and healthful environment.” This is a legacy we should all strive to uphold.
Source link
Brian Schweitzer,clean,clean air,clean water,environment,environmental laws,George Ochenski,healthful,Montana Constitution,Montana Supreme Court,Steve Bullock,Ted Schwinden