Escalating Tensions: Thailand Launches Airstrikes on Cambodian Military Amid Border Dispute

Thailand’s military is significantly stronger than Cambodia’s. With 361,000 active personnel, Thailand has three times Cambodia’s military manpower. This strength is also visible in their weaponry.

According to a report by the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), Thailand is well-funded and boasts one of the best-equipped air forces in Southeast Asia. The US recognizes Thailand as a major non-NATO ally, which has led to long-term support for its weapon programs. Recently, Thailand has also enhanced its military ties with countries like China, Israel, and Russia, fostering a robust domestic arms industry.

In terms of air power, Thailand has at least 11 modern Swedish Gripen fighter jets, along with many US-made F-16s and F-5s. On the other hand, Cambodia lacks any combat-capable aircraft.

Ground forces also tell a different story. Thailand operates dozens of modern battle tanks, including 60 advanced Chinese VT-4 tanks, compared to Cambodia’s roughly 200 older Chinese- and Soviet-made tanks. Additionally, Thailand has over 600 artillery pieces, significantly more than Cambodia’s modest arsenal.

In the air, the Thai army uses advanced equipment, such as US-made Cobra attack helicopters. Cambodia relies on older Soviet and Chinese models. Thailand’s soldiers regularly engage in international military drills, like the annual Cobra Gold exercises co-hosted with the US. This exercise is notable for being the longest-running of its kind in the world, originating in 1982.

Recent surveys show that public perception of military strength influences national pride. In Thailand, a significant portion of the public views a strong military as vital for security and regional stability.

Thailand’s military history also emphasizes the importance of a well-prepared armed force. Historically, strong militaries have played pivotal roles in shaping national policies. Given the current geopolitical landscape, Thailand’s military might remains crucial for its position in Southeast Asia.

For more on this topic, you can check the International Institute for Strategic Studies for detailed reports on military balances worldwide.

Source link