Federal Judge Rules Trump Violated the Law by Deploying National Guard to Los Angeles

In 2025, a federal judge ruled that President Trump violated the Posse Comitatus Act by deploying the National Guard to Los Angeles. This 19th-century law limits military involvement in civilian law enforcement. Judge Charles Breyer emphasized that although there were protests and some violence in Los Angeles, there was no rebellion requiring military action.

Breyer’s ruling includes strict limitations on military activities. The judge stated that unless valid constitutional reasons exist, the military cannot be involved in apprehensions, searches, or crowd control. His decision reflects a growing concern about the government’s increasing military presence in civilian life.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s legal team argued that Trump’s deployment of approximately 4,700 troops, including Marines and National Guard members, violated this law. They pointed out that the military’s activities included assisting immigration authorities during enforcement actions—functions prohibited under the Posse Comitatus Act.

Bonta celebrated the ruling as a reminder that presidential powers have limits. He stated, “Trump is not king,” reinforcing that the military’s role on U.S. soil should protect civil liberties, not undermine them. California Governor Gavin Newsom echoed these sentiments, highlighting the threat of establishing a national police force under Trump’s leadership.

The ruling coincides with broader discussions about the role of military forces in American communities. Some experts argue that using the National Guard for law enforcement can blur the lines between military and civilian roles. In recent years, there have been more instances where the military has engaged in civilian law enforcement duties, raising alarms about potential overreach.

Recent statistics show a spike in military involvement in civilian matters: National Guard members were involved in over 60 operations with immigration authorities between June and July 2025. According to testimonies, these troops participated in about 75% of missions conducted by federal immigration agents during that time.

Judge Breyer questioned the logic behind allowing military forces to assist in law enforcement under the premise that it protects federal employees from potential threats. He noted that extending this rationale could lead to endless military involvement in civilian functions, potentially jeopardizing democratic principles.

The case has ignited a robust debate on social media, with users sharing their concerns and opinions on military presence in civilian life. Some express fears of authoritarianism, arguing that using military forces in cities could intimidate citizens and stifle dissent.

In summary, the ruling against Trump’s military deployment in Los Angeles underscores the ongoing tension between presidential authority and civil liberties. It serves as a critical reminder of the importance of maintaining clear boundaries between military and law enforcement roles in America. For more on the Posse Comitatus Act and its implications, you can check out resources from the American Civil Liberties Union.

Source link

Donald Trump,Gavin Newsom,immigration,Los Angeles,U.S. Supreme Court