From Climate Champion to Climate Crisis: Understanding the Shift Towards Climate Terrorism

In recent days, the Indian government has issued alarming threats concerning Pakistan’s water rights under the Indus Waters Treaty. The focus is on the Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab rivers, crucial resources for Pakistan’s agriculture and rural life. It’s important to note that international law does not allow India to unilaterally divert or block these waters. The Indus Waters Treaty, established in 1960 with the World Bank as a guarantor, represents a binding legal agreement. Any violation by India would attract significant global attention and consequences.

While these threats may raise concerns among citizens, it’s essential to understand that water cannot be easily weaponized. India already controls the eastern rivers—Sutlej, Ravi, and Beas—under the Treaty. Each year, during monsoon season, these rivers overflow, often causing damage in India before reaching Pakistan. The reality is that nature doesn’t follow political agendas, and floods will occur regardless of tensions.

Moreover, pollution adds another layer to this crisis. India’s rivers, despite being under its control, suffer from severe contamination due to industrial waste and agricultural runoff from Indian cities. Reports indicate alarming declines in water quality, particularly in the Sutlej and Ravi. The treaty stipulates that water must remain usable for its intended purposes. Polluting these rivers is a violation of this commitment. Pakistan must strongly respond by gathering evidence and raising formal environmental complaints under international law.

This situation underscores broader climate inequities. India is the third-largest emitter of greenhouse gases, releasing about 2.7 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide each year. In contrast, Pakistan contributes less than one percent but endures some of the most severe climate impacts, such as floods and droughts. This disparity highlights a tragic reality: Pakistan, already a victim of global warming, faces further threats to its survival.

Historically, India has positioned itself as a leader in climate action. At the 2013 Delhi Sustainable Development Summit, Indian leaders pledged to lead climate initiatives in the Global South. Yet, the current reality starkly contrasts those commitments, revealing a troubling hypocrisy.

Breaking the Indus Waters Treaty could set a dangerous precedent. Such an action wouldn’t just affect India and Pakistan; it could undermine trust among countries worldwide that rely on similar agreements for shared water resources. This instability could echo throughout neighboring nations, raising significant global concerns.

Pakistan’s farmers are at the heart of this struggle. They are not just food producers; they uphold the country’s food security and economy. Disrupting their water supply threatens not only agriculture but also national stability.

India’s threats reflect a desperate political strategy rather than genuine strength. Pakistan’s response must be firm and composed. Engaging on international platforms like the UN and World Bank is crucial. The world needs to recognize India’s conflicting stance: advocating for climate leadership while engaging in activities that undermine its neighbors.

Water should be a source of life, not a weapon of political maneuvering. Protecting the rights of Pakistan’s farmers and future generations is vital. No political threat can undermine Pakistan’s resolve to safeguard its water and agricultural landscape.

Ultimately, Pakistan’s rivers represent more than just water; they symbolize the lifeblood of the nation. Every drop nourishes its people and sustains their identity. Despite external pressures, the spirit of Pakistan will remain steadfast in defending its resources and ensuring a prosperous future.