Groundbreaking Victory: Gay Employee Secures Health Benefits Rights for Spouse in CRS Lawsuit – New Ways Ministry

Catholic Relief Services (CRS), the largest Catholic aid organization in the U.S., has been ordered to pay $60,000 to a former employee, referred to as John Doe. He was denied health coverage for his husband, even though they had received it for 16 months.

Initially hired in 2016, Doe was informed his husband would get health insurance. However, in 2017, he learned that coverage would be stopped. When Doe challenged this decision, he faced threats of termination.

Doe sued CRS, claiming they discriminated against him based on his sexual orientation and violated several laws, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. CRS argued their religious affiliation exempted them from some anti-discrimination laws.

Judge Julie Rubin from the U.S. District Court for Maryland ruled that CRS couldn’t withdraw benefits. She stated that while some employees might be exempt under Maryland law, Doe’s role did not directly support CRS’s religious mission. This decision marks a significant legal victory for LGBTQ+ rights, as it’s the first such ruling in Maryland applying the Supreme Court’s test regarding religious exemptions.

In a previous ruling in 2022, another judge had found CRS violated federal discrimination laws, but the case was sent back for further review. In the latest ruling, the court clarified that Maryland’s anti-discrimination laws do not violate CRS’s First Amendment rights.

Doe expressed happiness with the ruling, emphasizing the importance of legal protections for LGBTQ+ workers in Maryland. He hopes CRS will use this decision as a chance to treat all employees equally, regardless of their sexual orientation.

This case highlights the ongoing struggle for LGBTQ+ rights within religious organizations and brings attention to the balance between religious beliefs and anti-discrimination laws. According to a 2023 survey by the Human Rights Campaign, nearly 50% of LGBTQ+ workers report discrimination at their jobs, underlining the need for continued advocacy and legal protections.

As society evolves, these rulings may set new precedents, shaping how organizations approach LGBTQ+ rights and equality in the workplace.



Source link