This article looks at a rising and controversial movement in the U.S. that promotes having more babies. The movement is led by people like Simone and Malcolm Collins, who have become key figures in the pronatalist community.

Their Perspective on Babies
Simone and Malcolm live in a quaint little home in Pennsylvania, filled with their children. They believe that declining birth rates threaten society, claiming the world needs more families. They aim for at least seven kids, stating they would have more if they could. Their approach, however, often raises eyebrows. For instance, they’ve used advanced technology to select embryos based on traits like intelligence.
Malcolm candidly admits that the couple has crafted their public persona to gain attention. "Saying something outrageous gets people talking," he explains. Their bold statements have caught the notice of influential figures, including people in the Trump administration, making them think they have allies in high places.
Why Are They Gaining Attention?
Fertility rates in the U.S. are at an all-time low—just 1.62 children per woman, as reported by the UN. This number suggests that by the end of the century, many countries could face population decline. The Collinses argue that this poses serious risks to the economy and society.
Public figures like Elon Musk also share similar views. He has frequently noted that declining fertility is a major threat to civilization, donating millions to initiatives focusing on family wellbeing and fertility research.
Political Dynamics
Politically, the pronatalist movement aligns mainly with conservative ideals. The Collinses have expressed their disillusionment with liberal policies, seeing themselves as part of a coalition that opposes what they call "urban monoculture." This coalition encompasses a spectrum of beliefs, uniting under the common goal of boosting birth rates.
Earlier this year, JD Vance, the U.S. Vice President and known advocate for traditional family values, made headlines by declaring his desire for more babies in America. This aligns with the growing sentiment on the right that views declining birth rates as a looming crisis. Even Donald Trump has hinted at pushing pro-family policies, evidenced by an executive order aimed at improving access to IVF.
Challenges Within the Movement
However, the pronatalist movement is not without its divides. Some conservatives express concern about using technology in reproductive health, while others clash over issues like birth control and family structures. This complexity raises questions about the future of their united front.
Moreover, some advocates within the movement hold controversial views connected to genetics and race. These perspectives have drawn criticism from a broad spectrum, as they stray into ethical dilemmas about reproductive choices.
What Lies Ahead?
The debate around pronatalism continues to heat up, influenced not only by personal beliefs but also by potential policies that could shape family dynamics in America. As the Collinses and their supporters push for reform, experts suggest that their influence may reflect changing cultural attitudes toward family and reproduction.
Will these pronatalist advocates find a stronghold in Washington, or will their controversial methods draw backlash? Observers continue to monitor how their influence will intertwine with broader societal and political issues.
For further exploration of fertility trends and its societal impacts, check out resources provided by the UN here.
Check out this related article: Trump’s Bold Move: Unleashing the Nuclear Option on Tariffs – What It Means for You
Source link