During Donald Trump’s first term as president from 2017 to 2021, the White House went nearly two years without an official science adviser. Now, as he prepares to start his second term on January 20, signals suggest he might prioritize science and technology more this time around.
Trump has already nominated three key individuals for science advisory roles. If approved by the Senate, Michael Kratsios, who was the chief technology officer during the first term, will lead the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). He’ll also serve as the president’s science adviser. David Sacks, known as a tech investor, is tapped to be the ‘AI and crypto czar’ and chair the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). Lastly, Lynne Parker, a roboticist who managed AI initiatives in Trump’s first term, will assist both Kratsios and Sacks.
Kirstin Matthews, a science-policy researcher, notes that Trump’s quick appointments indicate a focus on AI. Although the advisers have not yet commented publicly, Trump expressed enthusiasm for his science advisory team on his social media platform, promising to drive innovation and maintain America’s technological edge.
Science advisers can have a strong impact on presidential policy. A historical example is John Holdren, who played a key role during Barack Obama’s presidency. His influence shaped significant climate policies, thanks to his close relationship with the Obama administration. In contrast, Trump’s first science adviser, Kelvin Droegemeier, was appointed much later into the term and lacked the same level of access and influence.
Researchers were often frustrated with the scientific direction during Trump’s first administration, especially regarding COVID-19 responses. This time, with Kratsios nominated as assistant to the president, there’s cautious optimism in the research community. Many believe this role could enhance his influence over policy decisions.
While Kratsios may not have a traditional science background, some researchers view him as a positive addition. His experience suggests he understands the importance of science in government, even if his primary focus is technology. The OSTP aims to coordinate scientific initiatives across various federal agencies. This includes large projects like the BRAIN Initiative that seek to tackle complex scientific challenges collaboratively.
The PCAST, which typically consists of experts from various fields, also plays a vital role by advising on diverse scientific matters, from advancements in firefighting techniques to the implications of nanotechnology. Observers will be watching closely how this group is formed in the new administration as it will be an indicator of the science policies Trump’s presidency will pursue.
In summary, as Trump prepares for a new term, the decisions he makes regarding his science advisory team could significantly influence the future of science and technology in the United States. Researchers are eager to see if this will lead to more informed and science-based policies.
Source link
Government,Policy,Politics,Science,Humanities and Social Sciences,multidisciplinary
