How University Presidents Like Julia Brown Are Championing the Resistance Against Trump

Recent resistance against President Trump’s threat to withdraw federal funding from universities is gaining momentum. Over 400 academic leaders have signed a statement condemning what they see as government overreach into higher education.

This surge in support feels overdue. When Trump first challenged the independence of universities, many remained silent or reluctant to act. For instance, Columbia University initially chose to align with government demands to secure needed funds.

Having spent decades working in higher education, I’ve seen how university leaders often favor compromise over principles. Many presidents operate more like managers than educators. They prioritize funding and fundraising, which can overshadow intellectual integrity.

One president at a private university expressed reluctance to sign the petition openly, citing no apparent benefit. It seems financial concerns often take precedence, leaving moral and ethical issues overlooked.

In a recent congressional hearing, Harvard’s president, Claudine Gay, demonstrated a lack of preparedness when challenged on her school’s response to antisemitism. Some leaders struggle in crises, while others, like Bard College’s Leon Botstein, actively champion the ideals of education and democracy. Botstein has long called for universities to unite against governmental threats.

Fortunately, we’ve seen more presidents step up recently, spurred by Alan Garber of Harvard who defied Trump with a powerful letter. However, the community still awaited action from leaders, while others like Botstein were always clear about their stance.

While salaries for university presidents can be staggering, like the former president of Boston University earning over $2 million per year, many students grapple with immense debt. I’ve seen students like Jennifer, who worked multiple jobs to support her education and family. The stress they endure adds to the urgency for change.

If university leaders redirected even a fraction of their hefty salaries to student aid, it would not only alleviate financial burdens but also restore some credibility. However, true leadership requires more than just financial gestures; it requires empathy and genuine commitment to student welfare.

As it stands, merely sending a letter to the Trump administration will not engage students and faculty in the necessary fight for education rights. There’s an urgent need for actionable steps. Without them, when funding cuts impact students, many may call for appeasement rather than resistance.

Leaders who exemplify sacrifice and commitment will inspire the community to persist. The struggle is just starting, and it demands more than noble intentions.

Julia Brown is a professor emerita at Boston University and resides in Northampton.

Source link