Reflecting on his nearly forty years in Christian higher education, sociologist John W. Hawthorne expresses concern that many Christian universities make decisions driven by fear.
In his book, The Fearless Christian University, Hawthorne describes how these institutions often grapple with various fears: fear of societal changes, fear of losing their religious identity, and fear of not being seen as legitimate educational establishments. He believes these fears can hinder their progress and well-being amid cultural upheavals and dwindling student numbers.
Hawthorne argues that Christian universities often appear to be fighting a battle against perceived threats, which leaves them reactive instead of proactive. This fear can cause them to shift their focus away from what really matters: the experiences and needs of their current students. During an interview with Inside Higher Ed, he elaborates on this point.
Q: What do you mean when you advocate for fearless Christian universities? What are their biggest fears?
A: They are afraid of many things.
Take the recent situation at Wheaton College, for example. After congratulating alumnus Russell Vought on his appointment as the OMB director, they faced backlash from different groups. Some were upset about Vought’s views, while others criticized them for backpedaling. This back-and-forth illustrates how Christian colleges often feel pressured from opposing sides, making them hesitant to take firm stands.
They worry constantly about being seen as drifting away from their mission. This fear often overshadows the genuine concerns of their students, leading to tensions within the school community.
For Hawthorne, a fearless approach would mean placing student needs and experiences at the forefront. This strategy would empower universities to affirm their mission and confidently articulate their goals in the broader educational conversation.
Q: You discuss how the student demographics at Christian universities have changed. How is this shaping their needs?
A: In my early years in administration, I noticed students began asking different questions. They were more passionate about various issues, such as LGBTQ rights and racism. For example, at one college, students pushed for an open discussion on homosexuality, which the administration initially resisted. This moment highlighted a generation of students who are increasingly aware of and concerned about social justice.
Today’s students have grown up amid significant events like the Me Too movement and issues surrounding climate change. They have firsthand experiences with diversity and understand systemic problems in ways our generation did not. Their realities are not abstract; they connect back to their lived experiences. This gap between what administrators focus on and what students care about is a challenge that needs addressing.
Q: You suggest that Christian colleges focus on “culture creation.” What does that mean?
A: Many Christian universities find themselves on the wrong side of issues that resonate with students. They may seek support from older donors and trustees, but their stance often comes off as outdated, especially in the age of social media. It’s clear they don’t really win these battles.
Instead of engaging in culture wars, universities could tackle contemporary issues like LGBTQ rights and racism collaboratively. By bringing in diverse perspectives and engaging in dialogue, Christian colleges could contribute positively to broader conversations and assist churches in navigating these topics.
Q: Some university leaders believe that sticking firmly to their Christian identity will boost enrollment. Why do you think addressing these issues might be more effective?
A: Just declaring a university as “Christ-centered” doesn’t fully capture its mission. It can distinguish a Christian university from others, but it can’t truly define its purpose in today’s context. Universities need to articulate their mission in ways that resonate with current realities and student experiences.
Q: How do you think a second Trump administration might affect Christian universities?
A: Honestly, it’s hard to predict. However, there is an opportunity here. With the current administration signaling support for Christians, institutions might feel less pressured by fears of government interference. This could be a moment for them to embrace fearlessness and tackle issues like diversity and inclusion on their terms.
Q: You point out that real change in universities requires collaboration among faculty, trustees, and administrators. What does that look like in a Christian university?
A: I would like to see a stronger connection between trustees, faculty, and students. Engaging faculty early on when addressing problems can create more collaborative solutions. Unfortunately, all too often, decisions are made behind closed doors, only to be presented as completed by administration. More transparency and communication would benefit everyone involved.
Q: You’ve suggested radical changes, such as loosening faith statements and being more open to LGBTQ+ students. Has this caused any backlash?
A: So far, I’ve mainly heard positive feedback from faculty, who seem to resonate with the idea of fearlessness. I haven’t yet gotten reactions from trustees or presidents, but I’m curious to see how they will respond. A few Christian colleges branching out in this new direction could pave the way for change without losing their core values. That’s my hope moving forward.
Source link
Higher, Education, News, Jobs, Events, Career