A judge has stepped in to temporarily stop the Trump administration from laying off thousands of federal workers due to the ongoing government shutdown. This comes just days after reports showed that around 4,000 employees had received layoff notices from various agencies.
US District Judge Susan Illston backed the unions that filed the request, arguing that the administration was misusing the funding lapse that started on October 1 to push through these layoffs. Illston pointed out public statements from President Trump and budget chief Russell Vought that hinted at political motives behind the cuts, including Trump’s mention of targeting “Democrat agencies.”
During a recent government forum, a Department of Justice attorney argued that the unions needed to take their claims to a federal labor board first. Meanwhile, the Trump administration plans to challenge the judge’s order.
Major departments, including Treasury and Health and Human Services (HHS), indicated they would inform employees about layoffs. The Treasury Department alone planned to cut about 1,446 jobs. HHS initially warned of layoffs affecting between 1,100 and 1,200 workers, but later adjusted this figure to roughly half that number. Other agencies, such as the Department of Education and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, also signaled cuts.
According to Vought, the goal could be to let go of over 10,000 federal employees throughout the shutdown. He mentioned in a podcast that the current layoffs were just the beginning, hinting that the number could rise significantly.
This situation has spurred reactions from various unions, notably the American Federation of Government Employees and AFL-CIO, which filed a lawsuit against the administration. They argue that layoffs during a shutdown aren’t a necessary action and that many federal employees are already furloughed without pay.
As the shutdown drags into its third week, the Senate has struggled to pass a resolution to reopen the government. This marks the ninth failed attempt. The Republican majority blames Democrats for this deadlock, asking them to support a straightforward funding measure. On the other hand, Democrats want resolutions that tackle rising healthcare costs for lower-income Americans.
This standoff is emblematic of broader political tensions in the U.S., highlighting differing priorities and strategies that both parties hold. For more details on the impacts of government shutdowns, you can check resources from the Congressional Research Service.