Xavier Stickler has a rich connection to downtown Portland, especially the historic South Park Blocks. “Those beautiful brick buildings make you feel like you’re stepping back in time,” says Stickler, a Portland State University (PSU) student majoring in urban planning and architecture. Many residents share his affection for these structures, especially those built in the early 20th century. They evoke a sense of belonging and history.
However, this cherished landscape is at risk. Blackstone Hall and Montgomery Court, both significant to PSU’s history, are slated for demolition. University officials argue that these aging buildings can’t serve modern student needs and that renovation is financially unfeasible. As a result, plans are underway to replace them with new student housing.
Stickler joins a group of preservationists urging the PSU administration to rethink their plans. They worry that tearing down these buildings erases important cultural landmarks and harms the environment. Although PSU acknowledges their historical significance, administrators suggest that maintaining the old structures is simply not practical.
The history of Blackstone Hall and Montgomery Court adds weight to the debate. Blackstone was built in 1931 and is noted for its unique Egyptian revival architecture. Its stunning features include intricate tilework and leaded glass windows, making it a standout in Portland’s architectural landscape. Montgomery Court, initially the Martha Washington Hotel for Self-Supporting Women, played a key role in Oregon’s women’s rights movement. It was a safe haven for working women for over 50 years, emphasizing its cultural significance.
Advocates for preservation argue that PSU decision-makers might not fully understand the history and impact of these buildings. Heather Flint Chatto, from the Architectural Heritage Center, warns against choosing demolition. “It would be like tearing down a Frank Lloyd Wright masterpiece,” she says. The buildings may not have federal historic status, but they are included in Portland’s Historic Resources Inventory, indicating their importance.
As PSU moves forward with plans to construct new student housing to attract more students, they are mindful of a broader trend: universities across the nation are reevaluating how to meet students’ needs while balancing preservation. Statistics reveal that modern students often prioritize affordability and convenience over historical charm.
The urgency for new housing stems from ongoing enrollment challenges at PSU. Despite their intentions, the decision to demolish these historic buildings raises questions. Stickler suggests considering alternative solutions, such as renovating the existing structures while building new dorms on separate parcels of land. Chatto advocates for a “lend-lease” model, where the university could engage developers to finance renovations while retaining use of the buildings.
Environmental impacts are another significant concern. Research indicates that renovating existing structures can result in lower carbon emissions compared to new construction. The preservationists challenge PSU to explore all options before resorting to demolition. They argue that integrating modern housing with existing historic buildings could serve both students and the community.
For now, PSU plans to proceed with demolition by August 2026. However, many students continue to voice their desire to preserve Portland’s unique architectural heritage. “It’s easy to tear down what requires effort to maintain, but is that best for our community?” Stickler asks. The conversation surrounding these buildings is a reflection of a larger dialogue: how societies define value in culture, history, and progress. The outcomes could resonate far beyond just the influence on campus—they could shape Portland’s identity for generations to come.
Source link
Portland State University | Housing | History | Portland | Culture | Students | Education



















