Revitalizing India’s Foreign Policy: Why Fresh Leadership is Essential for Bharat Bhushan’s Vision

Admin

Revitalizing India’s Foreign Policy: Why Fresh Leadership is Essential for Bharat Bhushan’s Vision

India’s foreign policy is at a crossroads. Once overly reliant on US support, the country must now rethink its approach. This shift is not just a response to changing global dynamics but also a chance to redefine its identity.

Recent changes, like the punitive tariffs from former President Donald Trump, have caused Indian officials to look towards Moscow and Beijing. This pivot is often framed as strategic adaptability, but it feels more like damage control. Both Russia and China see India’s outreach as a potential gain in their quest for a multipolar world, and they are likely to welcome these moves. Notably, Moscow has suggested reviving the Russia-India-China (RIC) dialogue, hinting at a shift in alliances.

Historically, India has stood out amid the Global South for its democracy and respect for law. Now, it finds itself aligning with more authoritarian countries. Despite claims of a “special” partnership with Russia, India still maintains ties with the US. This balancing act raises questions about its long-term strategy.

China has swiftly recognized the shifting tides. For instance, during the 2020 conflicts over the Line of Actual Control, India refrained from publicly acknowledging Chinese aggression. Now, after repeatedly calling for boycotts of Chinese goods, India faces the challenge of rebranding China as a partner instead of a threat.

A recent visit by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to New Delhi marks a potential thaw, with India agreeing to a new “early harvest” approach for border negotiations. This could isolate disputes with China, paving the way for agreements that might favor Beijing, particularly regarding Bhutan.

While India has asserted support for the “One China” policy, interactions suggest a need for clarity on Taiwan. Confusion surrounding India’s stance highlights the complexities of its foreign relations.

However, much of this engagement seems transactional. Issues like border tensions and intelligence support to Pakistan remain unaddressed, revealing underlying distrust. India appears to be buying time, hoping for better ties with the US while cautiously maneuvering with Russia and China.

Domestically, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s “neighborhood first” approach has faltered, with strained relations with South Asian neighbors. Once a show of unity, Modi’s 2014 inauguration has starkly deviated from current realities.

Critics argue that Modi’s focus on personal diplomacy—high-profile summits and social media engagement—has not translated into substantial outcomes. This reliance on a glamorous approach has left fundamental strategic interests unmet.

Many blame this predicament on advisors who pushed an aggressive alignment with the US through frameworks like the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) and various defense deals without considering the ramifications. This tilt has come at the cost of nurturing other relationships.

Inadequate foresight and a lack of diversification in trade have left India exposed. It’s essential for new voices in foreign policy to emerge, allowing India to reclaim its ambitions without being tethered to any singular alliance.

By understanding the complexities of its geopolitical landscape, India has the opportunity to redefine its path in the international arena, balancing between great powers while fostering regional cooperation.

For more in-depth analysis on global policy shifts, consider reviewing insights from the Council on Foreign Relations and related reports.



Source link

washington, India-US relations, donald trump, moscow, china, russia, taiwan,