TULSA, OKLA. (KTUL) — The U.S. Supreme Court has made a major ruling by overturning Richard Glossip’s conviction. He has spent nearly 27 years on death row for a crime he insists he did not commit.
In a 5-3 decision, the court has dealt a big win to Glossip’s supporters, who have been vocal about the serious mistakes in his case. They argue that he was convicted based mainly on flawed testimony and misconduct by prosecutors.
Glossip was found guilty in 1998 for allegedly planning the murder of his boss, Barry Van Treese. The key evidence? The testimony of Justin Sneed, the man who admitted to carrying out the crime. Sneed struck a plea deal, promising to testify against Glossip in exchange for a lighter sentence.
Supporters, including former state representative Kevin McDugle, believe the prosecution’s case was deeply flawed. McDugle remarked, “It all started the day that Justin Sneed pointed the finger at Richard Glossip. There just isn’t enough evidence to even jail him.”
An independent investigation found that important evidence was kept from Glossip’s defense during the trial. Attorney Mike McBride III, who was involved in the investigation, noted that Sneed had been under psychiatric care and was taking lithium at the time of his testimony, which raised serious questions about his reliability.
This investigation highlighted issues surrounding the legal process from the very beginning. David Weiss, co-lead of the investigation, criticized both of Glossip’s trials, pointing out key mishaps throughout the proceedings.
In a surprising turn, Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond also acknowledged flaws in Glossip’s conviction, showing a rare willingness to admit mistakes within the legal system.
McDugle expressed that Glossip’s situation underscores bigger problems with how the justice system works in Oklahoma. “If mistakes happen, we need to admit them, not just brush them aside,” he said.
Throughout his nearly 30 years on death row, Glossip has maintained his innocence even after facing execution nine times and having three last meals. With the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn his conviction, it is now up to Oklahoma prosecutors to decide whether to retry his case.
Source link
Glossip,Oklahoma,Supreme Court,Conviction,Misconduct,Evidence,Trial,Innocence