Senate Agriculture Appropriations: No Progress on Food for Peace, But Exciting Changes for Hemp!

On July 10, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved the Fiscal Year 2026 Agriculture appropriations bill. This bill includes an intriguing twist regarding the Food for Peace program. While some agricultural leaders hoped to transfer it from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to the Agriculture Department, the committee decided to hold off—providing $1 million for a future study instead.

Another key aspect is a new provision aimed at refining hemp regulations. Senators Mitch McConnell and Jeff Merkley collaborated to ensure hemp remains safe and beneficial by clarifying what constitutes hemp and preventing the sale of hallucinogenic products. This change allows farmers to work under current rules for this year’s crop, keeping the focus on health-oriented hemp products.

The push to shift Food for Peace has historical roots. This program began in 1954 to address agricultural surpluses and assist those in need worldwide. Recently, advocates argued effectiveness is enhanced by purchasing food closer to crisis areas. However, U.S. farmers insist on sourcing food domestically, believing this supports local economies better.

The bill’s overall budget remains steady at $21.7 billion, with a notable increase for the Special Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). Despite this, the Food for Peace funding dropped from $1.6 billion to $1.5 billion for fiscal 2026, raising concerns about food availability internationally.

User reactions on social media showcase mixed feelings. Many farmers express frustration over perceived neglect from recent administrations regarding essential programs like this, while others feel the reforms could lead to greater accountability.

Experts from agriculture, like Dr. Keri D. Hench, emphasize the importance of carefully tracking these changes. “Agricultural policies shape not only the economy but health outcomes in communities both local and global,” Hench points out.

This bill’s discussions reveal the complexities within U.S. agricultural policy. As the Senate prepares for further negotiations with the House, many anticipate the impacts that these changes may have on food security, both at home and abroad.

For further information on agricultural policies and their effects, you can check the USDA’s official reports here.

Source link