The European Commission has come under fire for using funds from the EU’s LIFE Program, designated for environmental efforts, to support left-leaning NGOs. This move, reported by Austria’s eXXpress newspaper, raises serious concerns about political biases and transparency.

The LIFE Program has a budget of €9 billion aimed at addressing climate issues since 2014. However, some of this funding has allegedly been misused to undermine conservative and Eurosceptic voices in Europe. The Commission acknowledged that some funded organizations engaged in "inappropriate lobbying activities."
Internal documents suggest a concerted effort to silence critics, particularly those skeptical of the EU’s central policies. This includes a network of NGOs working to influence conservative lawmakers and political parties. Peter Liese, a spokesperson from the conservative European People’s Party (EPP), criticized this misuse of taxpayer money, demanding an end to such practices.
Reports indicate that around €15.5 million a year from the LIFE Program has been funneled to NGOs with conditions to support the Commission’s agenda. These organizations were allegedly instructed to target critics of the EU’s Green Deal through aggressive lobbying tactics.
Frans Timmermans, a former EU Climate Commissioner, is said to have orchestrated this operation. NGOs like the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) played a key role, developing lobbying strategies directly aimed at conservative members of the European Parliament. One of their tasks was to sway decisions on climate legislation, framing dissenters as harmful to environmental goals.
Concerns are growing over the transparency of NGO funding. Only a third of organizations receiving LIFE funding report their finances, leading to accusations that the EU is not only providing funds but also shaping lobbying strategies. The EEB was reportedly pressed to show that its efforts influenced EU laws, aiming to counter conservative opposition.
This controversy has united various right-leaning groups within the EU, including the EPP, European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR), and Identity and Democracy (ID). They are calling for accountability and have threatened to cut funding for certain NGOs if their demands for transparency and reform are not met.
As the situation escalates, whistleblower accounts about secret contracts have emerged, intensifying the claims against the Commission. Some parliamentarians are pushing for reforms to prevent such abuses in the future. There’s also growing dissatisfaction with the EU’s climate policies, especially as European leaders face economic pressures linked to other geopolitical issues, like Russia’s actions and the push for increased military spending.
Public reactions are mixed, with many questioning the alignment of climate policies with national interests. As debates continue, calls to reconsider the Green Deal are gaining traction, reflecting broader economic and political shifts across Europe.
This situation serves as a reminder of the ongoing tensions between environmental initiatives and political power plays within the EU, highlighting the need for greater oversight and clearer policies moving forward.
For more detailed insights and data on this topic, you can refer to the European Commission’s official records or analyses from reputable news sources like Reuters.
Check out this related article: How Climate Change is Transforming Bangladesh: A Closer Look at Its Challenges and Resilience
Source linkclimate funds, climate policy, conservative voices, ECR, EPP, European Commission, European Parliament, Eurosceptic, Frans Timmermans, Green Deal, LIFE Program, Lobbying, NGOs, PfE, transparency,