Stephen Miller, a key adviser to former President Trump, recently spoke about potentially ending due process protections for unauthorized immigrants. He suggested that the U.S. Constitution allows for these protections to be suspended during times of invasion.

Miller’s comments sparked questions. He didn’t clarify if he was referring specifically to certain groups of unauthorized immigrants or to all in that situation. He criticized the courts, claiming they often hinder executive actions in immigration matters.
Trump has expressed frustration over what he sees as delays caused by constitutional protections. In a recent interview, he mentioned that these legal processes slow down efforts to deport individuals he labels as criminals.
The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that no person can be deprived of their rights without due process. This has historically included noncitizens. Yet, Trump argued that following these protections can be inefficient, suggesting it would require an overwhelming number of trials for all those facing deportation.
Interestingly, the Constitution permits suspending due process during an invasion. Trump previously described the immigration crisis as an invasion, citing alleged criminal activities by gangs operating in the U.S. Despite his claims, three federal judges determined these actions did not constitute an invasion.
Recent Supreme Court rulings reaffirm that individuals targeted for deportation have rights under the law, emphasizing the importance of proper notification and due process.
Historically, the writ of habeas corpus has been suspended four times, including during the Civil War and after the Pearl Harbor attack. Legal experts note that while suspending this right can empower the president significantly, it raises serious concerns about overreach and the potential for abuse.
For more on the legal implications of these discussions, you can refer to the National Constitution Center.