Four tribal nations and environmental groups are pushing Michigan courts to reverse the state’s approval of Enbridge’s Line 5 tunnel project. They argue that expanding this pipeline threatens the Great Lakes and ignores important tribal and environmental concerns.
Attorneys for the groups stress the need for a broader look at alternatives to the existing dual pipelines that transport crude oil and natural gas liquids beneath the Straits of Mackinac. Carrie La Seur, the legal director of For Love of Water, highlights the risk these aging pipelines pose. She points to Michigan’s Environmental Protection Act, which calls for a detailed evaluation of alternatives to any project that might harm the environment.
“This act demands a thorough analysis before moving forward with something that could cause damage,” La Seur explains.
Enbridge has defended the state’s decision, noting the extensive evaluation undertaken by the Michigan Public Service Commission over nearly four years. During this time, they considered various perspectives and concerns about the project.
La Seur warns that the tunnel project is both vast and complex, involving drilling deep beneath the land and extending over four miles. She emphasizes the potential hazards involved, stating, “Transporting flammable materials poses significant risks. Cleaning up any spill would be extremely difficult.” She believes that the unique challenges presented by this tunnel are worthy of serious consideration.
Currently, the court has not made a decision. Enbridge also awaits a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which has postponed its review of the project. A draft environmental report from the Corps is expected to be released this spring.