Trump’s General Nominee Declares: ‘I’ve Never Worn a MAGA Hat!’ – What This Means for America’s Military Leadership

Washington — President Trump has nominated Lt. Gen. Dan Caine as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. However, Caine recently disputed a claim made by Trump that he once donned a MAGA hat as a sign of loyalty. During his confirmation hearing, Caine clarified, "I’ve never worn any political merchandise or said anything to that effect."

Trump had recounted a meeting with Caine in Iraq at a political event, alleging that Caine expressed deep admiration, stating, "I love you, sir. I think you’re great, sir. I’ll kill for you, sir," and then put on a MAGA hat. Caine responded firmly, asserting that Trump may have been referring to someone else.

This nomination is noteworthy for several reasons. Caine is a three-star general who recently retired, which makes him an unconventional choice. Typically, this role requires prior service in a four-star position. However, the president has the authority to waive this requirement under the law according to U.S. Code.

In his announcement, Trump underscored Caine’s potential impact, saying, "Alongside Secretary Pete Hegseth, General Caine and our military will restore peace through strength, put America First, and rebuild our military."

During the hearing, Caine also addressed issues surrounding a Signal chat that shared operational details about strikes in Yemen. He emphasized the importance of maintaining the element of surprise in military operations, stating, "Never put our war fighters in any harm’s way." When pressed for more details about the chat, Caine chose to refrain from commenting due to an ongoing investigation requested by the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Caine’s impressive background includes serving as the director of special programs for the Pentagon’s Special Access Program Central Office. He’s logged over 2,800 flight hours as an F-16 pilot, including more than 150 hours in combat.

As military and political landscapes evolve, Caine’s nomination and the controversies surrounding it reflect broader trends in leadership appointment practices. With increasing scrutiny over military transparency and operational security, more discussions may arise regarding the balance between allegiance and professionalism in military service.

Source link