U.S. Asks Allies: How Would You Respond in a Taiwan Conflict?

The Pentagon is urging Japan and Australia to clarify their roles in a potential conflict over Taiwan. This has raised eyebrows among key allies in the Indo-Pacific region. Elbridge Colby, the U.S. under-secretary of defense for policy, has been at the forefront of discussions, pushing nations to enhance their military readiness.

In talks, Colby emphasized the need to strengthen deterrence against China’s growing influence in the area. According to one source, the U.S. is asking for specific commitments from Japan and Australia regarding their potential military responses, which has caught both nations off guard. They are concerned because the U.S. itself has not provided a clear commitment to defend Taiwan.

The U.S. has long maintained a policy of “strategic ambiguity,” avoiding clear statements about its defense obligations to Taiwan. Yet, President Biden has, on several occasions, suggested American intervention, contrary to the stance held by previous administrations.

Zack Cooper, an Asia expert at the American Enterprise Institute, explains that it’s tough for allies to project what they would do in a scenario involving Taiwan when there’s uncertainty regarding the U.S. response. He notes that if U.S. leaders are not making firm commitments, it feels unrealistic to expect the same from allies.

Japan’s defense ministry indicated it’s challenging to respond to hypothetical emergency scenarios regarding Taiwan. The Australian embassy in the U.S. has not commented on the matter directly.

This push for clarity follows Colby’s reviews of key defense agreements, such as the Aukus deal, which pivots the focus toward Canberra’s naval capabilities. He has also raised concerns about European allies concentrating too much on Indo-Pacific issues instead of Euro-Atlantic ones.

Internally, the Pentagon has faced scrutiny over Colby’s decisions, including one that briefly halted weapons support for Ukraine, which was later reversed by the president.

As Japan and Australia feel the pressure to increase defense spending, many believe they must do so more quickly than European counterparts. The situation is particularly delicate for Japan, especially with upcoming elections that make defense discussions politically sensitive.

The U.S. is trying to convey a unified stance, aiming for fairness and equity in defense contributions among allies. Yet, some feel Colby might overlook their specific concerns in the quest for stronger deterrence.

The discussions reflect a crucial moment in the Indo-Pacific, where military readiness and clear pledges among allies could shape the region’s stability in light of China’s ambitions.

For more insights, consider referring to the Council on Foreign Relations for a deeper analysis on U.S. foreign policy in Asia and its implications.

Source link