Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky recently signed a controversial bill that many believe undermines the country’s anti-corruption efforts. Critics argue the law places the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (Nabu) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (Sapo) under the control of the prosecutor general, raising concerns about their independence.
In his defense, Zelensky stated these agencies would still function but needed to eliminate “Russian influence.” After the bill’s passage, protests erupted in Kyiv, marking the largest anti-government gathering since Russia’s full-scale invasion began in February 2022. Demonstrators also took to the streets in Lviv, Dnipro, and Odesa. Signs displayed messages like, “We chose Europe, not autocracy,” highlighting the frustrations of many citizens.
Zelensky’s loyalist, Ruslan Kravchenko, now has the power to reassign corruption cases which could hinder investigations. In his remarks, the president expressed frustration at the slow progress of anti-corruption cases, pointing out that some have stalled for years.
This move contradicts over a decade of Ukraine’s efforts to promote democracy and combat corruption. The push for such changes began after the Euromaidan uprising and the subsequent fall of pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych in 2014. These events were pivotal in Ukraine’s shift towards a pro-democracy path, particularly in response to Russia’s actions in the region.
Western allies, who had significantly supported Ukraine’s independent anti-corruption system, are now watching closely. The system was established to meet conditions for aid, promoting transparency and judicial reform vital for Ukraine’s EU aspirations. European officials, like spokesperson Guillaume Mercier, expressed concern about recent developments, stressing that progress in anti-corruption is key for continued support.
The European Commission has been clear: any rollback of the independence of Nabu and Sapo could hinder Ukraine’s European Union ambitions. Marta Kos, the European commissioner for enlargement, pointed out on social media that the weakening of these anti-corruption safeguards is a significant setback.
As the situation develops, it remains to be seen how Ukraine’s allies, particularly the G7 nations, will respond. There is hesitance to withdraw support during a time when Ukrainian forces face serious challenges on the battlefield.
In a world where nearly 87% of people believe corruption is a serious problem, as highlighted by the 2022 Transparency International survey, the stakes are high. Ukrainians are demanding accountability and justice, and how their leaders respond will shape the country’s future in the fight against corruption.
For more details on Ukraine’s anti-corruption measures, you can refer to Transparency International.