Recently, I visited Federal Plaza in Lower Manhattan. The area buzzed with activity. People were there for services from various federal agencies like Social Security and Immigration. In one corner, new citizens snapped photos to celebrate their accomplishments. But a quieter scene unfolded at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), where many offices were lifeless.
This somber atmosphere followed HHS’s announcement to close five of its ten regional offices, aiming to streamline operations and cut staff by 20,000. The New York City office, which served several states and territories, was among those set to close.
Public health experts warn that these regional offices are crucial links between the federal government and local communities. They help manage grants for programs like Head Start, handle Medicare complaints, and assist hospitals in enrolling for Medicare or Medicaid. Closing these offices could significantly impact public health services nationwide.
Georges Benjamin, the executive director of the American Public Health Association, emphasized, “All public health is local.” He noted that regional offices understand community needs better than anyone else.
The other offices facing closure are located in Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, and Seattle, together serving 22 states and territories. Tasks from these offices will be handed over to remaining locations in Atlanta, Dallas, Denver, Kansas City, and Philadelphia.
The closure has already affected programs like Head Start, which provides essential services to low-income families. New York and 18 other states are suing the federal government over these changes, fearing many social programs could grind to a halt.
Bonnie Eggenburg, from the New Jersey Head Start Association, expressed deep concern. She described the regional office as vital in supporting programs during emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic and past natural disasters. “Our go-to people are gone,” she said, highlighting the uncertainty many programs face now.
Delays in payroll and funds have compounded the issue, with federal employees questioning budget support due to a new initiative called “Defend the Spend.” Eggenburg explained that many services are now left in limbo without direct contacts at the HHS.
Organizations that relied on the regional office for support say they feel abandoned. Susan Stamler from United Neighborhood Houses noted that without clear communication and support, many services for families could falter. “A website can’t replace the human contact we need,” she asserted.
The consequences go beyond local programs; the flow of public health initiatives and their implementation will likely suffer. Zach Hennessey, from Public Health Solutions, stated, “Without regional offices, HHS will be less in tune with local health needs.”
Dara Kass, a former HHS Region 2 director, likened the office’s role to that of an ambassador, ensuring communities had access to vital services. The closure of multiple division offices, such as those for the FDA and Substance Abuse services, further limits HHS’s local reach.
The federal response to these changes has been somewhat dismissive. HHS claims these closures won’t harm services, but experts see a different story. The reorganization may help streamline operations but could hurt essential local partnerships that have taken years to build.
As crucial federal agencies face restructuring, state health officials like New York’s James McDonald are left grappling with the fallout. The transition is “total disorganization,” he described, leaving local teams unsure of where to turn for help.
This shift in regional support isn’t just about staffing; it reflects a significant change in how public health is perceived and managed in the U.S. Health initiatives that once thrived on local expertise now risk falling through the cracks amid bureaucratic adjustments.
For ongoing updates on health news and public policy, consider looking into resources from trusted organizations like the KFF Health News and related public health advocacy groups.