Understanding Climate Impact Assessments: Why Meshack Mboya Believes They Matter for a Sustainable Future

Climate change is a critical issue. Recently, the Environment and Land Court in Nakuru highlighted this during its ruling regarding Sosian Energy Limited. Back in 2017, this company sought approval for geothermal exploration in Menengai.

To get this approval, a comprehensive Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) is essential. This study needs to be done by certified experts and submitted to the National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA) for review and public input.

Sosian received its license in 2021. However, local groups challenged this decision, leading to an appeal in the Nakuru Environment and Land Court. Judge Millicent Odeny canceled the license, directing Sosian to conduct a fresh ESIA that includes proper public participation and a thorough climate impact assessment.

Many in the community felt sidelined in the original decision-making process. The court’s recent ruling emphasized that public involvement is vital and that climate impacts must be assessed before project approval. Justice Odeny noted, “How can affected parties give feedback if they see assessments only after the project starts?”

Additionally, the court addressed the “triple planetary crisis,” a concept that refers to the worsening challenges of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The ruling underscores the need for concrete action against climate change to protect future generations.

This decision aligns with Kenya’s progressive environmental laws, which are often hindered by implementation issues. The Constitution promotes public participation, especially in environmental matters. Article 42 guarantees everyone the right to a clean and healthy environment.

Globally, climate change poses significant threats, affecting weather patterns, food security, health, and overall quality of life. Even the United Nations has recognized a clean environment as a human right, acknowledging that environmental degradation and climate change affect present and future generations.

In light of this, the court’s decision is a significant stride toward ensuring sustainable development in energy projects, including geothermal initiatives. It enforces that even renewable energy efforts must adhere to environmental regulations.

This ruling is particularly relevant as geothermal power plays a crucial role in reducing Kenya’s carbon footprint. As climate change increasingly impacts hydropower reliability, this energy source becomes even more vital. However, the court’s decision also stresses the importance of maintaining environmental rights for local communities.

A balanced approach is crucial in these discussions. While the need for sustainable energy methods is undeniable, community rights and environmental safeguards cannot be overlooked. An effective Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) system must address concerns while allowing necessary projects to proceed, ensuring both community welfare and environmental protection.

The implications of this ruling could resonate far beyond this case, influencing how future environmental challenges are addressed in Kenya and potentially setting a precedent for similar cases around the world.

This situation echoes previous significant rulings, such as the 2019 Save Lamu case, which also emphasized rigorous environmental assessments and community involvement. Such cases signal a growing recognition of the need for responsible development that honors both human rights and environmental integrity.

The future of energy projects in Kenya, especially as they relate to public health and environmental sustainability, will rely heavily on the lessons learned from these judicial decisions. Ultimately, achieving sustainable development means embracing a path where community voices are heard, and environmental rights are firmly upheld.



Source link

Climate,assessment,Environment,energy,temperatures,food system,the star newspaper,star news Kenya,the star