Understanding BECCS and Its Impact on Climate Goals
The climate crisis isn’t just about cutting down greenhouse gas emissions. It’s about actively removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. One promising solution is Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS). This technology allows us to generate renewable energy while permanently sequestering carbon dioxide underground. As we work to meet global climate targets, BECCS stands out due to its potential to remove up to 10 gigatons of CO2 annually by 2100, according to reports from the IPCC and other reputable sources.
When we use biomass for energy, BECCS not only provides renewable power but also captures CO2 emissions during the process. As trees absorb carbon dioxide, BECCS ensures that this carbon is securely stored underground after energy generation, making it a vital tool in the fight against climate change. Research indicates that, to limit global warming to 1.5°C, integrating BECCS into our climate strategies is essential.
Understanding Wood Resources
Wood is a renewable resource but not limitless. Different forest products, ranging from high-quality logs to leftovers like branches, have various uses—construction, pulp for paper, and BECCS. How we manage these resources is crucial. Regulatory bodies are increasingly looking at how we can best utilize our forest products to balance energy needs with sustainable practices.
A recent study by Anthesis, commissioned by Drax Group, examined the carbon emissions associated with various wood feedstocks used in BECCS. The study highlights different uses, including:
- Biochar (for soil enhancement)
- Pulp, paper, and packaging products
- Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF)
- Construction materials like oriented strand board (OSB)
The focus of this study is not just to quantify carbon savings from using wood for energy but to compare the benefits against other applications. Applying lifecycle assessment (LCA)—which examines GHG emissions throughout a product’s lifespan—enables a clearer picture of the climate benefits of each wood use.
Key Findings
The findings from Anthesis suggest that BECCS shows the most significant carbon footprint advantages, even more than traditional bioenergy applications. Exceptions arise with specific uses of manufacturing residues, such as producing OSB, which can outperform BECCS due to substituting high-carbon materials. This insight is crucial as industries strive to find the best approaches for carbon reduction.
The Future of Wood Use
Wood-use hierarchies are evolving. Recent regulations, especially within the EU, have emphasized prioritizing material uses over energy production. However, the Anthesis study argues that BECCS can yield greater climate benefits than many wood-based products. Understanding these complexities through lifecycle assessments allows us to make informed decisions about resource use to achieve our climate goals.
As the bioeconomy continues to grow, the development of new wood-based products is accelerating. This suggests that measuring the long-term benefits of wood products won’t always align with simple guidelines. Instead, LCA provides a robust method for evaluating the environmental impacts of various wood applications, ensuring we maximize climate benefits.
The insights garnered here align with ongoing European Commission discussions regarding carbon removals and the future of bioeconomy strategies. Considering lifecycle analysis when determining how best to use wood resources is essential for ecosystem health and climate stability.
For a deeper dive into these findings, access the full Anthesis White Paper [here](https://drax.com/white-paper-beccs-life-cycle-analysis).
Dr. Caroline Gaudreault, Director and LCA Lead at Anthesis, highlights the importance of LCA in resource management.