Unlocking the Ocean’s Potential: How Geoengineers Are Targeting Dead Zones for Carbon Storage

Scientists and entrepreneurs recently gathered in Bucharest to explore a straightforward idea for combatting climate change: sinking agricultural waste into the ocean. This concept aims to capture carbon stored in plant material, preventing it from returning to the atmosphere.

The hope is that a new operational standard will boost interest in this form of carbon removal. If successful, large quantities of crop waste could be dumped from ships into places like the Black Sea and the Gulf of Mexico. This method could not only help the environment but also create a financial market around carbon credits.

However, this idea raises critical questions. How much environmental damage could it cause? Concerns persist about its effectiveness and potential distractions from more traditional methods of addressing climate change, such as reducing emissions.

The ocean absorbs a significant portion of carbon dioxide, acting as a natural sink for emissions. It also captures about 90% of the heat from human activities. Given its vastness, the ocean is viewed as a potential solution for cooling the planet.

Morgan Raven, a carbon cycle expert at the University of California, Santa Barbara, cites historical data showing that organic materials in the ocean once helped cool the Earth during a period of extreme warmth. The challenge now is to adapt this natural process for short-term human benefit.

Raven is part of Carboniferous, a company looking to use marine anoxic carbon storage (MACS) to sink agricultural refuse like straw into the ocean. Supporters emphasize that, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, carbon removal is vital for achieving net-zero emissions.

While some view this as an emergency measure, the ocean’s complexities present challenges for implementation. Companies need funding, often relying on selling carbon credits to offset emissions. The voluntary carbon market allows businesses to buy credits from those who can prove they’ve reduced carbon in the atmosphere.

Recently, Puro.earth introduced a methodology to certify carbon removal via ocean biomass storage. This approach aims to streamline the market for carbon credits. Marianne Tikkanen, a co-founder of Puro.earth, believes this method creates a structured way for companies to remove carbon economically.

On the other hand, environmental skeptics question the long-term consequences of these methods. They argue that while sinking plant matter might appear beneficial, it could disrupt complex underwater ecosystems. Cristiana Callieri, a marine researcher, warns that we should not jeopardize ecosystems, even for a good cause.

Additionally, there is historical precedent that raises flags. The now-defunct company Running Tide aimed to promote this concept but ultimately had to shut down due to financial failures and scalability issues. Critics stress the importance of a cautious and thorough review of potential environmental impacts before widespread adoption of such methods.

In summary, while the concept of sinking biomass to mitigate climate change is promising, it’s essential to weigh the potential pitfalls against the benefits. Balancing ecological impact and urgency in addressing climate change remains a complex discussion.



Source link

Carbon dioxide removal,Technology